/lit/ - Literature

NO EN VALORES, SINO EN RENTAS, DISCURRE EL MUNDO;

POCO LO VALÏOSO VALE,

MAS MUCHO LO MÜY RENTABLE;

EL MUCHO VALOR POCA RENTA REDITÚA;

AQUELLO QUE ES EN RICA RENTA REDITUABLE

EN POBRE QUILATAJE SE PRECIA Y VALÚA;

AQUESTO QUE EN MUY GRAN VALOR ES ESTIMABLE

POR NIMIA NONADA SE TIENE Y DEVALÚA;

INVERSA ES LA RAZÓN DE RENTABILIDAD

Y VALOR, SIENDO QUE EN ESTA MUNDANIDAD

NADA RENTA SI MUCHO VALE,

Y TODO VALE SI ES RENTABLE.

>>16921669


«WHY NOT» WHAT?

>>16919914
>... you can't be doing stupid shit like that! Comprende!

JA JA.


>Why is everything I am writing being twisted and misinterpreted by readers.

BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THE VVLGVS DOES; THE VVLGVS WILL ALWAYS DISTORT, DERIDE, OR CONFUTE, WHAT THEY RECOGNIZE AS EXCELLENT, OR MERELY INCOMPREHENSIBLE; IF THE VVLGVS LIKES YOUR WORK BE SURE THAT IT IS MEDIOCRE WORK —THE VVLGVS EXALTS MEDIOCRITY WHILST SABOTAGING EXCELLENCE.

THE POETICAL AUTHOR'S PURPOSE IS NOT TO APPEAL TO THE VVLGVS, ESPECIALLY SO WHEN THE AUTHOR IS GENIAL, AND/OR INGENIOUS; YOUR PURPOSE AS A POETICAL AUTHOR —ID EST: A CREATOR OF ART— SHOULD BE TO REIFY, AND COMMUNICATE, A CONCEPT, OR SET OF CONCEPTS, IN THE FORM OF AN ARTIFACT, BECAUSE, REGARDLESS OF HOW IT IS INTERPRETED, THE ART OBJECT IS AN END IN ITSELF, BUT WHILST ACCOMPLISHING THAT, YOU MUST ALSO, WITH JUST REASON, COUNTER OR DEFY THE ESTABLISHED NORMALITY; OTHERWISE YOU WOULD BE MAKING CONFORMISTIC, KITSCHY SCHLOCK.

>>16919734


WHY DO YOU ASSUME THAT I IGNORE THAT?

THE REFERENT DOES NOT ALTER THE FACT THAT THIS THREAD IS OFFTOPIC, INANE TRASH.

YOU SHOULD NOT PREOCCUPY YOURSELF THOUGH, SINCE THIS THREAD WILL REACH THE HUNDREDS OF REPLIES, SINCE IN THIS BOARD ONE CAN POST ACTUAL GARBAGE SO LONG AS IT IS SAFE FOR WORK, NOT «RACIST», AND IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE.

>>16919715


?

THIS THREAD IS OFFTOPIC, INANE TRASH, BUT IT IS IN ENGLISH, NOT IN SPANISH, THEREFORE, IT IS OK.

>>16919135


THAT IS AKIN TO ASKING: «WHICH BRAND OF SOLUBLE COFFEE IS THE BEST?» —THEY ARE ALL PSEUDOCOFFEE.

>>16919093


«EL INGENIOSO HIDALGO DON QUIXOTE DE LA MANCHA» IS UNTRANSLATABLE.

>>16918935

>DERIDES AN AUTHOR WHOSE WORKS HAS NOT EVEN READ.


YOUR OPINION IS WORTHLESS.

>>16918188


WITH USERS WHO MAKE THESE THREADS DERIDING, OR MOCKING, AYN RAND, OR HER WORK, THE ANSWER IS TYPICALLY: «NO».

>>16918479


PROBABLY NOT, BUT CERTAINLY NOT THE BEST AUTHOR.

>>13268977

IT IS NOT NONSENSE; YOU ARE COGNITIVELY DEFICIENT, AND SPIRITUALLY IGNOBLE.

>>13267573

WILLIAM FAULKNER = WILL I FALTER? YES.

DO NOT HEED THE REQUEST; THE ORIGINAL POSTER IS PROBABLY AN EMPLOYEE OF SOME AGENCY; REPORT, AND IGNORE.

>>13265999

NO BOOK, BUT, RATHER, OTHERS.

>>13265780
>cookie doe

A CRAZY FEMALE DEER?

THE DOMINICAN ORDER IS THE CLOACA WHERE ALL THE DREGS OF JUDEOCHRISTIANITY ACCUMULATE, AND FESTER.

>>13265434

I «DID NOT» WHAT?

RE: DINOSAURS, ASTRONOMY, CRYPTOZOOLOGY, HUMAN ANATOMY; ALSO: FOLKTALES, LEGENDS, AND «THE BIBLE».

S Y N

T A X .

IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER:


— SAINT TERESA OF ÁVILA.

— KELSEY BASYE.

— JUANA INÉS DE LA CRUZ.

— SAVITRI DEVI.

— NAHUI OLLIN.

— AYN RAND.

— LILI REINHART.

— VIRGINIA WOOLF.

>>13263692

IT SEEMS THAT YOU ARE MERELY INTELLECTUALIZING YOUR DEFICIENT CONSCIOUSNESS, MANIFESTED IN YOUR LACK OF VOLITIONAL DISCRETION.

IF YOU STRUGGLE IN SOMETHING SO BASIC, AND EASY, AS CHOOSING A BOOK TO READ, I DOUBT THAT ANYTHING OF WORTH WILL COME FROM YOUR DISCUSSION OF ANY WORK OF LITERATURE.

REGARDLESS OF THAT, I SUGGEST SOMETHING SIMPLE, BUT DEEP, LIKE CHILDREN'S LITERATURE —EXEMPLI GRATIA: THE BROTHERS GRIMM'S CHILDREN & FOLK TALES, «THE LITTLE PRINCE», ET CETERA.