/lit/ - Literature

>>10383618
They are all letters, I have 60 more that I’ve posted here before, these are just the most recent. A person’s soul is a complex geometric figure. Someone’s literature etches parts of the author’s soul, but letters give a number of different angles, colors, and shadings. If Jung was correct, you can’t learn as much from an artist’s mass produced work, because the ‘idea’ that is this work is sullied by the conscious thought of millions of near-apes. However, letters and other less printed work offer us particular ideas that are unique to the souls of these writers, and if one were to get an accurate enough sketch of an author’s soul, by reading less-read ideas, other pieces of the author’s understanding will, although they are not addressed in text, will inform your conception of the author’s soul, his perspective (because like attracts like in this metaphysical context), effectively allowing you to let the author live through you, or let you see through the author’s eyes (in a sense that is more real than the literal meaning of this expression). But Jung was probably wrong, so fuck it. But you asked, faggot.

Majority new, fuck you

>>10382247
Ya, I’ve seen this a few times. The way they get around the black and white issue is using different fonts rather than colors. Different fonts is also better because the stylings of the fonts can correspond with the qualities of a character, while colors are a bit too monotone to take advantage of this benefit.

>>10377547
I used to stay high 24/7 and I’m only recently realizing that social anxiety was the biggest contributing factor to the excessive use. I had always been against the Xanax family of drugs because I’ve seen a lot of shit heads take them and act like begged shit heads, but I recently started taking anti anxiety meds and they do pot’s job and make me socially fluent, and even outgoing. I don’t know about long-term use or consequences, but maybe something you want to try at least to temporarily boost social confidence to let you know you are capable of it.

>>10378603
I really, really hope you all are just taking a somewhat ironic anti-reddit vote by ... whatever the fuck is going on here... Jesus. I hope this all is a joke, or one person larping as a cunt-dick Dan Brown supporter

>>10374301
Also it would allow no-names such as yourselves, to get content into the hands of millions of people, skipping all the bullshit publishing roadblocks. I have listened to so many unheard-of artists that I wouldn’t have listened to otherwise because Spotify bypasses distribution and record label boundaries that we faced in the 90’s. There are a ton of people writing right now that I would love to read but they will not go through the effort of being someone’s bitch in order to be published. It would be good for independent writers and consumers (we fall in both of those categories) so why the fuck not?

>>10374272
I know there’s are ways around paying for e-Books, I could just pirate them all, but the same goes for music, while the ease offered by Spotify changed the game for music, it moved reason toward subscribing as opposed to pirating, and Spotify has allowed me to explore so much music I wouldn’t have otherwise and made listening to music much more enjoyable for a number of other reasons that I didn’t account for before subscribing. I think a literature version of Spotify would also offer a number of unanticipated benefits as well that would give it a definite advantage over piracy (not that I’m against piracy)

Is there going to be a Spotify equivalent for e-Books? Can we go ahead and push this into production?