/lit/ - Literature

Jannies have been active this week and /lit/ has improved because of it. They also dealt with the gardnerspammer.

>>20558939
Reading books about the craft is still reading, anon.

>>20541239
>>20541143
>>20541019
>>20540656
>>20541568

>>20524601

>>20344301
kek
>>20344289
Get owned

>>20190730
>I have a girlfriend

>>19546526
>Volume 4 is basically nothing but hot babes fighting over the dudes. Berelain is hot as fuck and kicks Faile's shit in to ride Perrin's dick. Elayne is basically a quivering virgin mess for Rand. Now this is the kind of fantasy that's based.
Fuck, you made me remember that people actually hate the series of “misogyny”. Never fails to make me chuckle to see women bitching about it. Especially with book 7.

>>19122131
Turn that frown arround and realise that you are the clown

>>19077912
The final redpill is that contrary to popular belief mathematics is not just applied logic. Indeed mathematics is the way more general discipline, and logic and even philosophy can be formalized and studied via mathematics (which may seem a bit paradox at first since the classical foundation of mathematics is logical). Lawvere said once
>It is my belief that in the next decade and in the next century the technical advances forged by category theorists will be of value to dialectical philosophy, lending precise form with disputable mathematical models to ancient philosophical distinctions such as general vs. particular, objective vs. subjective, being vs. becoming, space vs. quantity, equality vs. difference, quantitative vs. qualitative etc. In turn the explicit attention by mathematicians to such philosophical questions is necessary to achieve the goal of making mathematics (and hence other sciences) more widely learnable and useable. Of course this will require that philosophers learn mathematics and that mathematicians learn philosophy.

My personal advice would be to learn the necessary math in the following order
>basic math (up to highschool tier)
>basic set theory
>linear algebra
>real analysis
>topology
>differential geometry
>algebraic topology
>category theory
>homotopy theory
>higher category theory
>homotopy type theory
Should take about 4-8 years depending on how much you devote to study and how smart you are. Now, you are finally ready to read Hegel
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Science+of+Logic

>>18374486
>"forbidden /lit/" book club?

>>18025823
>We have a lot of great new ideas

I read books for 10-12 hours a day and spend the rest of the day thinking about reading.
This is not the case for me at all.
If i read YA i'd probably get dumber anyway so i'm just with books older than 70 years(plus contemporary detective stories to read when i need a rest).
Am i getting smarter? No
Do i express myself better? No
Do i enjoy reading? Yes

Diomedes not automatically in the highest tier means the list can be disregarded immediately thanks for playing

>>13756991

>>11914719
Belittle you for pre-natally pulling up your boot straps.

>>11302356
Okay, I knew Kant was a retard from his categorical imperative shit, but this is ridiculous.

>>11149216

Oh look a filthy commie stealing a slogan from Ron Paul....and a filthy rich beneficiary of capitalism style commie too, the worst kind. The holier than though idealist who has the comfy life and now wants to tell everyone how to live.

>>10728284

>>10675993
>political economy
what are you gonna tell us to read Polanyi and some IPE next?

>>10661765
>I'll finally be able to get white wymen once the evil white males are gone

>>10538124
because Asians don't have a victim complex! plus what is the point of grouping Japanese-Americans with Chinese-Americans and Korean-Americans and Vietnamese-Americans etc.
>>10541107
t. bugman

>>10516742
>late capitalist life

>>10366443