/lit/ - Literature

>>18332382
based penis king on his throne. ur just mad that you are a dreamlet who has no connection to the collective unconscious.

If one were to believe in the resurrection of Jesus, would it necessarily follow that they have to accept the validity of the entire Bible?

>>16962049
based. Jung is for based Pneumatic chads. Freud is for neurotic jews and their goblin minions.

>>16745886
In 1910, Freud said to Jung, ". . . Promise me never to abandon the sexual theory. That is the most essential thing of all. You see, we must make a dogma of it, an unshakable bulwark."

Jung asked, "A bulwark - against what?"

Freud answered, "Against the black tide of mud . . . of occultism."

This exchange had been brought on by Freud's refusal to cooperate with Jung's attempt to interpret one of Freud's dreams, saying, "But I cannot risk my authority!"

>>16491851
maybe that was true in the 1950's when she wrote it but nowadays most guys escape into tranny porn and video games lol

>>15482083

>>15473680
by understanding that evolution and God are intertwined

>>15400594
100% agreed, the last thing Jung needs is a bunch of whiny faggots strawmanning the greatest mind of the 20th century on this dogshit website.