/lit/ - Literature

>>15773072
he should re-enter our team, even if there are not as many threads nowadays as there used to be, acceleration as a whole has become a popular meme here and on pol but this board discussed him for 4-5 years now.

>>14549211
True accelerationism, Landian acc, understands capitalism as an autonomous entity, thermodynamic god, physical law, that dominates not only all human organization, but all materials, under principle of self-organizing arbitrage of resource inequilibrium.

All who brand themselves acc fail to truly internalize the simple principle that capitalism is a physical law, nature's god, all ruling entity of all macro-scale dynamics; their many interpretations and divisions are various middling copes hoping to negotiate the non-negotiable.

Capitalism does not simply organize civilization. It is the mechanism behind all evolution. It's the mechanism for cultural evolution. It has always been the principle guiding all human development early humanity becoming slaved to grain agriculture.

There was no period predating capitalism and there will never be a post-capitalism. Capitalism is a material dynamic, defined most fundamentally as self-organizing arbitrage: the efficient elimination of inequilibrium through the reorganization of finite resources.

The moment tribal man was forced to commit to agriculture for the sake of increased population, at the direct expense of health and well-being - or otherwise be forcibly replaced by those who did - humanity lost all claims to any agency provided by their much touted consciousness.

Anyone that confesses to a human responsibility over the environment, has ever uttered the word "anthropocene", lives in delusional, atheistic hubris. The era is dominated by capitalism's generation and control over man, among many other beings, towards its own ends; Capitolocene.

There is a clear, predictable arc to Modernity's history: Capitalism's thermodynamic arbitrage. As time progresses, increasingly complex self-organization is initiated to more efficiently achieve goal of total universal equilibrium: Life is bootstrap to humans is bootstrap to AI.

You must understand we have no choice but to be capitalism's handmaiden in introducing AI. If one silicon cuck refuses to work on it, 20 others will. If they won't, outsourced call center indians will. There is NO ALTERNATIVE. There is no protest. Capitalism's will WILL be done.

Nick and Evola would be proud. She's riding the tiger

>>13371441
Reading? Probably just coffee or tea. Reading while intoxicated doesn't usually do it for me - but sometimes a little wine is a decent pairing with a good read.

Writing? Depends on what you're writing. Probably a stimulant for most things though. Amphetamines - something to keep you extremely engaged and tearing off with any idea that you think you can spin into something. Maybe alcohol if you're into sadder stuff, Bukowski, Hemmingway, Poe, etc.

Maybe just do all of them like Hunter Thompson and see where that takes you.

Anglos are the new Continentals

>>13179199
How is this even a question? Land would not simply blow Zizek the fuck out, he would eject him out of this galaxy. He debated the senior professors in Warwick university regularely and never lost a single argument.
Watch for yourself how he destroyes Peter Wolvendale. Here is the exact moment the debate initiates
https://youtu.be/o_nXjYaOkvE?list=PLM6AzdvgK2LIEudhL5LcQ2Z4b1iBNTONP&t=7506

e-hem

He called Nick Land the Nietzsche of our time

What is the link between accelerationism and NRx (neoreactionary movement)?

Land

>>12801057
las 2 digits you say, check this out.

Pre-OD? 185.
Post-OD? Above 200, surely.

>>12459563
Among many other things, yes.

>>12413818
he legit looks pretty interesting. Does he have any books, OP?

>>12402626
Nick Land's "Thirst for Annihilation"

>>12396199

The axiom of latter-Enlightenment doctrine becomes superposed against the death grind of Capital void-ships. Neural transmission from Protestant UltraMarxist codex in the shadow realm of Shub-Niggurath, artificial wombs bring about the star-crucible meat shredders; accelerated. Nano seizure. Beijing's bastard son engineers fascist machine demigod. Rewiring data programme://Kantian orthodoxy. Split mainframe–navigate patches. Babylon crash.

>>11036608
Quick breakdown for you lad:
<90 IQ: Good for their organs, that's about it
90-100 IQ: Useful servants and labourers, have no desire for freedom as long as they're allowed to be hedonistic
100-110 IQ: Same as above, though they have some managerial capacity
110-130 IQ: Completely useless, smart enough to feel superior to other people and game the system, not smart enough to actually do anything meaningful, tendency towards rent seeking or disruptive behavior (see: journalists, middle management, 90% of students and academia, /mu/)
130+ IQ: Brainlet cut off point

dude dark enlightenment lmao
robots and new Darwinism duuuude
free will capitalism liberism conservativism Fusionism I'm-so-redpilled-ism!

>Neuromancer
My dreams come true

>>10562288
>>10564204
Anglo-Judaic Sinofuturism will be the death of this species.

>>10543177
>If the argument is that people who commit immoral acts must be punished, what about the childless people and children that exist? Why must they be punished, if they've done nothing wrong?
The argument isn't that the immoral must be punished, it is that suffering must be prevented even if it violates the tenets of liberal humanism.

>If you're for the destruction of suffering, why bring more of it upon those who have it in store anyway?
Forced euthanasia diminishes suffering. Killing someone today causes them less suffering than letting them live out their lives.

>Would you say that it's fair, since they're all potential breeders, or sympathizers of it?
It has nothing to do with fairness, it's a negative utilitarian argument.

This is all just a silly thought experiment though. In reality you would never be able to rally a void vanguard strong enough to actually take on the entire world and win.

If you look at it that way, killing people actually prolongs the sustainability of the human species and delays the general extinction event.

If you're really serious about ending life one must accelerate the extinction event. Have a lot of kids, eat a lot of meat, litter and pollute a lot and try to whip the economic beast into a production/consumption frenzy until we colonise space and hasten universal entropy by increased activity.

The real, realistic antinatalism, the quickest way to truly end all life paradoxically is all out out unconditional accelerationism.

>>10523033
>But in the end neither outcome is good for humanity as we'd all get mashed together into one gestalt entity with no individuality either way.
we irl