/lit/ - Literature

>>15349935
NOT MY HECKIN MISHIMERINO NOOOOO

>>15345642
>NOOO YOU CAN'T DOO THINGS I DON'T CONDONE

>>15224209
>simp

>Stop pointing out my basedeness!!
>Don't listen to him he is schizophrenic, he's seeing those "soiboys" in his head I'm not a soiboy! He's just schizophrenic, I'm not a soiboy soiboys arent real!

>"Hey! German hatter!"

>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T HAVE STORIES WITH INCEST P-PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN, FICTIONAL INCEST BAD BAD

>>15167164
>Not an argument.

>>15163608
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST PSYCHOANALYZE ME THROUGH A MATERIALIST LENS!!! MUH HEKN VAGUE MYSTICAL ESSENCE NO NO NO NOOOOOOO!!!!! MUH WHEAT FIELDS!!!!! MUH BLOND 15 YEAR OLD WIFE!!! YOU CANT DO THIS!!!!!

>>15155353
>No, North Korea is a perfect example of state capitalism.
NOOOOOOOO its not real socialism unless its my perfect imaginary system that will never exist !

>>15154371
H-hey faggot stfu I'm really based and I read the Greeks and Jordanio Petersono is my father figure!!!

>NOOOOOOOOO THIS BOOK DOESN'T ENTERTAIN ME SO IT'S BAD!!! YOU CAN'T JUST WRITE SOMETHING THAT HAS NO INTRINSIC MEANING!!!

>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>YOU DID NOT BELIEVE AND PRAY TO ME 6 TIMES A DAY!
>YOU WILL NOT GO TO HEAVEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>15100633
>simp

>>15001238
Capitalist countries literally built countless bases and nuclear missile silos surrounding their nations. Any people they threw in prison for opposing their regime was strictly out of self-defense, the CIA funded countless coups and programs with the intention of bringing down the Soviets from the inside. And any instances where the country's economy was run like an army and the workers had to work hard was again, just an exercise in self defense. Imagine if they hadn't ruthlessly modernized in the 30s? The Nazis would have probably eradicated the whole Russian nation. Stalin and Mao's actions were strictly, and I mean strictly in self defense against the capitalist threat.

>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO not the kingy wingy, not my heckin new york times bestsellerino!!!!! you just hate him because he's popular NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

>NOOOOOOOOOOOO NOT MY STANDARINO ENGLISHINO, NOT MY BURGERINO ANGLO-SAXINO, MY VANILLA DIALECTINO NOOOO

>Why is he a carrot?

>>14870570
>This is terrible. I was thinking about reading this book, thanks for saving me the trouble.

>>14865262
wtf bro, im so jealous, no mommy philosopher ever called me something like that. I would literally die happy if I was talking about Nietzsche with a hot older women and she called me freddy or something. I would literally die. Fuck you.

>>14862540
> book burnings are good if they're executed by a dictator i like!
> NOOOOOO NOT MY MEINKAMFERINO!! NO STOP BANNING BASADO BOOKOS WRITTEN BY REDPILLED FASHIS NOO NOT THE INCELUS MANIFESTINO FUCK YOU SJWS

>N-no! You can't use words if they're not mathematically precise things
Is this really the extent of this text?

>>14847469
>I fucking HATE science

>>14845973
Nooo, you can't own more stuff than me! It's not faaair!

>>14837320
> It cannot explain why non reproducible goods are so expensive, such as napkins signed by famous people, antiques, works of art, letters, and much more
no, this directly proves the validity of labour theory of value. Labour theory of value states that the only thing that substantiates value is that human hands performed an action. It does suppose that there is some kind of fixed dollars per hour of each human hand. Labour theory of value does not say that per hour, an engineer designing a bridge produces the same value as a worker digging a ditch. It merely states that all of the value that each of these two produce is in totality the human component.

Imagine your example of the painting or the napkin. Imagine that these items were produced by machines. A mechanical hand programmed to sign a napkin "Billie Eilish" What would that be worth? Not even close to the same value.