[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.17343008 [View]
File: 43 KB, 680x564, e36.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17343008

>>17341115

>> No.12576481 [View]
File: 43 KB, 680x564, apuholmes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12576481

If a work of fiction using its fictional scenario to virtue signal, is that thing they're virtue signaling about also fictional with no real world applications?

>> No.11710223 [View]
File: 40 KB, 680x564, 1520984359375.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11710223

>4Chan_Meme_Pepe_Old1.jpg

>> No.11529280 [View]
File: 40 KB, 680x564, 1520984359375.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11529280

By conservative they mean de Maistrean conservative, which better labeled as reactionary, so it should be called:
>/rg/ Reactionary General
I mean, sure, Burkean Conservatism is technically reactionary, but at the same time it is liberal. I suspect they call it:
>/cg/ Conservative General
is an attempt to avoid their thread being banned by the mods for being clear /pol/tardery. I also think that they are trying to get the reddit nu-conservatives to come in and read reactionary writers (which would honestly be an improvement).
The real question is why they think they need a general for their political ideology on a literature board. Just post about the books you want to talk about. generals are cancer anyway, but ideological generals especially so.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]