/lit/ - Literature

>>15041146
What's your point? They have corps under the state, Hitler had corps under the state. If state power is of the people and can dominate the corporate sector then that is inherently good for the people. Don't really care about the goal of achieving socialism as imagined by Marx, I don't think it's viable. You have lost track of what is important, which is the people and not btfo'ing some abstract system.

>>14984913
>If you're coming from a leftist paradigm this is not even an issue when workers will control the means of production
I have ascended beyond all of it. Hierarchies will always exist, collective ownership doesn't really work in practice but collective power does work. Now you might not care about the wages of people being pushed down by international finance moving people around for profit, nor about the crime and ethnic replacement that it brings because of some pie in the sky dream of collective ownership after a revolution that will never come, but the people do care about such things.
>Why are you so eager to prove that people who don't agree with you are "white"?
I really don't care if you are or aren't, traitors get the bullet too. Most people of west European stock have been taught by jews to hate themselves and their people and to value other ethnics higher. Again, you clearly have no love at all for the people and this is important to the position I'm coming from, which is that of the people.
>Christianity isn't right wing
It's radically right-wing, leftists are materialists and anti-religious. Both liberals and marxists oppose higher loyalities, such as to God.
>you can't use it to perpetuate your racist eugenicist agenda
Sure I could, if I had one.