/lit/ - Literature

>>4892635
It was a great book.

Inb4 flavor-of-the-month-lit-theory-meme

>>4859619
Phonies are spooks

Marx didn't really ever discover anything new.

The fact was that he combined became a real conscious awareness of it with the ability to put in down on paper for the good of all mankind.

Like he says, we are all involuntary egoists. His job is to make us voluntary (aware) of our illusions (spooks) and to give us what you might call a "choice", or at least something to think about.

If we only know for sure we live once, do we want to follow bullshit like paying taxes or playing by society's rules and helping others, when, you could simply ask "Why should I care about society?". If you come to the conclusion that you should not, then fuck society and please yourself.

If you conclude you like society and want to help, and are not simply being coerced by spooks and all that shit, then maybe you should help society and play by the rules.

Fuck I love how edgy Stirner makes me feel.

>"Since the beginning of the world all men have hunted me like a wolf—kings and sages, and poets and lawgivers, all the churches, and all the philosophies. But I have never been caught yet, and the skies will fall in the time I turn to bay. I have given them a good run for their money, and I will now.”

What are Max Stirner's views on property?

lel

>>4682451
How can you guys not understand what he is saying? Hes just highly conscious of language, and attempts to use language in a certain way because he thinks its the best way to get across his message. Maybe the only way.

Humans (roughly meaning his word, Dasein), are certain things (beings) like, say, foxes, who do things in a particular way that is unique to us (Being). We have a certain way of dong things, say compared to a fox. One of these things is our certain way of perception. The way we perceive may be different from the way a fox may perceive things. Adding to this, each individual human experiences things in a unique way compared to other humans. One reason for this is that we each have unique histories.

Now consider this unique being attempting to understand, create, or discover, "universals". Even if this unique being understands, creates, or discovers a or the "universal", they only perceive this universal in their particular way, based on things such as, their unique history. A 16 year human asking a question about a universal cannot go back in time. They are already stuck in their unique history.

Thats it

>>4673672
>Mama died
>I shot a man
>Fuck your shit you dirty priest
>Glory

/lit/, what are some of your favorite novels written in the first person? Which have the most unique voices?

The Catcher in the Rye is a pretty good one.

>>4541625
HIDF detected

>>4318669

Don't worry, friend, you're welcome here.

>>4279271
Because he's actually an amazing thinker.

I would kick the shit ouf that faggot. I can't believe someone can brag so much shit with that taste.
/lit/ has changed my way to write, mainly just for nanowrimo. Also i've developed a better taste for fiction in english. You bastards read only in your language, let's hope you guys get out of that isolated anglophone world soon.

Also i'm still an anarchist, i'm not changing my mind with your poor arguments.

>>4113497
>can't grasp the maximator

You're not fooling anyone, wikipedia skimmer.

>>3975360
Why do you give a fuck about what's considered childish?

>>3882399

Spooks are phony.

>>3805749
Does anyone have anymore Stirner variations?

>>3790803
that's half the point bby boy

we're not serious but we are sincere

Has your life improved, or degraded since a year ago?

>>3735288

Loved the book.
Actually written a short paper on it last week