/lit/ - Literature

>>22247253
>Absolutely insane that you typed all of this on your computer what an incredible specimen
>Ermmm, having a normal one much? Sir this is a Wendy's

>>21302184

>>20566380
>It’s your word for it, kid. It’s really hard to believe you still post frogs and ugly white guys. Shits a decade old. Yeah. Get used to it I guess. “Chud” is new, just replaced alt right

Please fucking god nigger go back. Your kind is not welcome and it never will be.

>>19814699
Tbqh, it's usually the Redditors who ironically drop this line. Boomer retards do it unironically but the Redditors are ten times more snoy.

>>19682739
> HISTORICAL CONTEXT anon here.
Its a refutation (or, really, a simple derision) of the burgeoning champagne socialism of Europhilic Russians in St. Petersburg.
>The Underground Man is not 'literally you.'
>Read the preface/introduction, kids.

>>18791830
>>18791861
>This coping schizo again
It's time you actually read BM instead of spreading retardation for months on end. Just how badly is corncob living in your head rent free? Kek

>>18754572
>Zoomers really are hopeless, eh?
You should know that better than others, my retarded friend.
>that greentext
That was why I was longposting but you are beyond hope it seems.
If you argue for objective ranking of stylists, why don't you make a case why Suttree can't be? So far you have said literally nothing beyond it can't be, even subjectively.
>Noooooo you must believe me even though I made no arguments whatsoever. Stop liking McCarthy. Somebody insulted me in a thread of his and now I want revenge :(((((:(((
Lmao embarrassing. I found you on the internet making your posts my retarded friend.

>>18557735
>"hmmmm th-that will show him"

>>18506373
t.
>suck two more cocks faggot
Now we are getting to 4chan way of reacting none of your faggot ass newshittery dumbass.

>>18479758
>Dostoevsky was an overrated hack. His prose is inelegant and rambling—I realize he wrote a lot as more words = more money for him, but that doesn't excuse bad literature. His character development is shallow at best, and on closer inspection his novels are shallow "thrillers"—reread any of his works and you'll be bored out of your mind as you'll already know the "twist." Furthermore, his "takes" are all garbage. He was a slavophilic, xenophobic Orthodox Christian, thus resulting in half-baked, pseudointellectual philosophical "takes." Dostoevsky reads like an evangelical bible-thumper who took too much adderall.