[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.16931300 [View]
File: 29 KB, 500x464, 1602312838042.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16931300

>>16931269
I gave you some advice because I already went through such a phase and I truly do want you to see the light some day. Your desire to communicate and share ideas with fellow anons shows that you really do care, empathy is part of our existence and you must be true to your heart.

>> No.12205268 [View]
File: 29 KB, 500x464, 3212142314123423143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12205268

>>12204626

>> No.11956989 [View]
File: 29 KB, 500x464, 1529583272210.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11956989

>>11956955
It's still a stupid definition, and stupidity is not Propaganda.
Propaganda is on some level aware that it's propaganda, it understands that certain aspects of what it is espousing are contradictory and puts a lot of effort into not talking about those weak points and making them invisible in order to win more idiots to its cause with unapologetic manipulation tactics.

>> No.11354261 [View]
File: 29 KB, 500x464, tacticalbladeofnihilism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11354261

>Derrida

>> No.9553450 [View]
File: 29 KB, 500x464, tacticalbladeofnihilism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9553450

>>9553356
Life does have an intrinsic meaning.

>> No.9224433 [View]
File: 29 KB, 500x464, tacticalbladeofnihilism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9224433

>>9224422
Fuck off Stirner.

>> No.9191669 [View]
File: 29 KB, 500x464, tacticalbladeofnihilism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191669

The problem with NRx is it's intrinsic nihilistic postmodernism.

If it argues that the axioms of liberalism and democracy are untenable and easy to deconstruct, the same applies to their own shitty ideology.

>> No.9167082 [View]
File: 29 KB, 500x464, blade.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9167082

>>9166325
Why is every single gripe about Peterson something like this, where the person bitches that in a 20min interview with an incompetent nu-journalist, Peterson didn't painstakingly and exactly define every single one of the terms he uses, in a situation where given the tiniest hint of epistemic charity the meaning becomes clear as daylight?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]