/lit/ - Literature

>>18629306
Carl Schmitt is the way

>>17049554
>>17049561
>>17050084
Jurists are based, OP read Carl Schmitt.

>>16001498

>friend vs enemy
>In-group vs outgroup
Liberalism successfully destroyed the ability for people in mass to prefer their in-groups interests over the outgroup and to even deny the existence of underlying tribal feelings that dominanted history. Are we all in a mass psychosis?

>>15931904

>>15885632
>totalitarian ideology
>implying there's such a thing as a non-totalitarian ideology
Oh no no no

>>15885006
>he thinks things can be separated from the political
Oh no no no

>>15767998
Well if you liked Hobbes, you'll like Schmitt who very thoroughly refuted Liberalism. Schmitt also wrote an entire book commenting on Leviathan.

>>15762780
None of them ever talk about Schmitt since he already btfo them with facts and logic

>>15742954

>>15738042
Because right wingers latch onto the most retarded of them. There's constant Evola posting but very little Schmitt posting. Same thing happens with more mainstream conservatives as well.

>>15606284
>Good right-wing authors
>no such thing
>*blocks your path*

>>15606037
There are good right wing philosophers who remain grounded in realism.

>>15563465
>Sounds like liberal bullshit

>>15352338
Schmitt is very well hidden from common discourse even though he's essential for high level political science.

I'll start

>>11762732
fuck off faggot

You know who

Why was Carl Schmitt so influential, when his main philosophical insight was that politics revolves around certain groups assigning enemies? Isn't that pretty obvious?

Is Carl Schmitt worth reading? If so, where to start?

Where ma boy Carl at?

>>10829815
>lecturer says there are no respected philosophers who say people are not morally equal
what

>politics is about recognizing who your enemies are

wow how profound. Why is this guy a major political philosopher again?

>>10804441
>Liberalism needs to distinguish between enemies and friends. If a society is funded on some principles and on historical events, those principles ought to be respected and those historical reasons ought to be understood.
Very good, Anon.