/lit/ - Literature

Non-essentialism, inhumanism (distinct from post-humanism), bio-ruism (Jordan Peterson is already going in this direction), Stirnerian egoism, anything that can move past a reality of pure non-value is, without rejecting the fact that a reality of pure non-value is the actual case, I think, viable. So the answer is not get rid of anthropocentrism, but to demonolithize it.

>>9719469
It's shocking when a desirable woman does it. You don't care about fat ugly bitches cucking their men because all the people involved are fat and ugly. You do get pissed in these cases because you yourself think a high status man deserves a desirable women, because you wish you got his position, because you're playing by *their* rules. You don't give a shit about improving the situation. You don't care about the people that got hurt or used, or how being a slut isn't actually benefitial to the women involved. All you're interested is that the hierarchy of things matches how you think it should be. It really isn't surprising there's guys that would preffer to have been women, to have had everything served to them on a plate like they were pets.

You said it is "expected"? Where the fuck do you think we are? When did 4chan became a place where we went to do what was expected of us?

>>8836904
>And this is all for the good, in his opinion
Nah, in the end he admits he does it because he enjoys doing it and doing what he does. He revels in himself. It's just that there's no a priori reason as to why that needs to go against other people, or that his sense of self needs to end at his body.

Stirner is the definition of True Neutral. It's just that he's the opposite of what's expected of that because his neutrality is based on being interested, not disinterested. What he posits is a philosophy in which, because you can't justify anything, all you do is for yourself, out of yourself, and only has yourself to blame or worry about. It's about not having having things between you and the world.