[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.15357404 [View]
File: 35 KB, 367x550, gorilla.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15357404

>>15357402

>> No.15204492 [View]
File: 35 KB, 367x550, gorilla.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204492

>>15204256
How?

>>15204262
Thanks for your reply. However, divine command theory comes last in a list of secular moral frameworks including: moral relativism, consequentialism, ethical egoism, Kant's moral theory, moral pluralism, virtue ethics, and moral particularism.
I don't say this out of stubbornness or bias, it's just that DCT is riddled with more philosophical problems and contradictions than the list I gave above. I guess this is why Aquinas' Natural Law is touted by Christian's all the time, but even this framework contains problems which would give reason to reject the principle of double effect and moral absolutism. This is a hill where I need help traversing.

>>15204308
If I'm not mistaken, I take you're a substance dualist. If this is the case, how would you respond to something like Spinoza's substance monism, which would imply a denial of personal immortality but retain God/Nature's perfection?

>>15204231
I'm trying.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]