/lit/ - Literature

National socialism is the synthesis of Marx's critiques of the bourgeoisie and capitalism, and his vindication of the rights of workers and producers over rent seeking parasites, with actual socialism, which was always nationalist and never Marx's exclusive property. It's just the liberation of socialism from Engels-style "we must dissolve the family!" social engineering (itself totalitarian and statist, and utopian, a great excuse for never doing anything) and internationalism (a fiction that can never exist since people naturally organize into distinct cultures).

National socialism is socialism for a culture that thinks of itself as a distinct unit. You don't have to be a Nietzschean will to power worshiper or a totalitarian to be a national socialist.

Ezra Pound:
>>I. When enough exists, means should be found to distribute it to the people who need it.
>II. It is the business of the nation to see that its own citizens get their share before worrying about the rest of the world.
>(This is akin to the Confucian idea that you achieve the good of the world by FIRST achieving good government IN your own country.)
>III. When potential production (possible production) of anything is sufficient to meet everyone’s needs it is the business of the government to see that both production and distribution are achieved.
>Note that in America when there was plenty and more than plenty of land, our government handed it out despite Quincy Adams’s protests.

>This third idea becomes an “idea statale” when I say “it is the business of the government.” But note that Mussolini is NOT a fanatical statalist wanting the state to blow the citizen’s nose and monkey with the individual’s diet. IF, when and whenever the individual or the industry can and will attend to its own business, the fascist state WANTS the industry and the individual to DO it, and it is only in case of sheer idiocy, incapacity or simple greed and dog-in-the-mangerness that the state intervenes to protect the unorganized PEOPLE; public; you me and the other fellow.

>The rest is political “machinery,” bureaucracy, flummydiddle. Jefferson, Mussolini, Lenin, all hated or hate it. Lenin wanted to get rid of it: “All this is political machinery, want to get rid of it,” as Stef reported Lenin’s opinion in 1918.

>As far as financial morals are concerned, I should say that from being a country where practically everything and anything was for sale, Mussolini has in ten years transformed it into a country where it would even be dangerous to try to buy out the government. In other countries they excuse inexplicable perfidies by saying “These men are personally honest.” I am now quoting an admiral : “All I know is that all these men are my personal friends and I assure you that they are personally honest.” The implication being that they play the super-crooks’ game because they are stupid and hoodwinked.

If the left would just
>give up the capitalist propaganda position of open borders
>be ambivalent or neutral about the right of communities to maintain ethnic or religious distinctions if they so choose
>claim to be race-neutral, workers' rights are the ONLY things that matter, anyone mentioning idpol is a dangerous subverter
>purge degenerate dead weight baggage like trannies
>purge losers and rich DSA LARPers by promoting elitism and dedication within the ranks
you would have a new working class metapolitics within 10 years, and 80% of the current libertarian-style conservatives would join you.

Just stop phrasing your shit as the party of trannies and polyamorous drug addicts for fuck's sake. Stop allying yourself with wealthy elites and feckless traitors, and purge those who do. Mock "The Squad" and anything else that stinks of selling out. The current ideological comportment of republican voters is 98% populism, 2% veneer of leftover libertarian ideology. They have the vaguest possible sense that "working hard is good, wanting shit for free is bad." You can have that entire voting and organizing base for free within 10 years if you JUST STOP TRYING TO GET THEM TO BE TRANNIES AND TALKING ABOUT HOW THE FAMILY UNIT IS BOURGEOIS.

>>14869856
Yes.