[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.19064417 [View]
File: 34 KB, 474x628, Schmitt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19064417

What did he think of Marx? Did he write about him?

>> No.18983890 [View]
File: 34 KB, 474x628, Schmitt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18983890

Why would you delete the only serious thread on the board?

>>/lit/thread/18982528

Original post
>Romanticism sucks, it's a soulless philosophical and literary movement that postulates a faux return to the ideals of the ancient past while also ignoring everything that made the past worthy of being remembered, all the pre-christian cultures in romanticism are seen through a judeo-christian perspective that automatically makes them antithetical to the social and cultural context of the epochs it tries to bring back from the grave. Romanticism is what Wicca and other pseudo-religious new age cults are to the ancient pre-christian traditions, romanticism has nothing in common with what its authors attempted to revive.

>> No.18877135 [View]
File: 34 KB, 474x628, Schmitt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18877135

>Inter pacem et bellum nihil medium.
>The conquest of the cosmos translates us into new immense spaces, it even subtracts us from the gravitation of the earth, and seems that it would not even have the necessity of an Archimedean point... Only whoever dominates the earth will dominate the new cosmic spaces, which are made accessible to the human thanks to the new technological means... The domination of the stratosphere or of the cosmos will have its repercussion in the strategy of wars that take place on this earth. Here too the war becomes total.

What did he mean by this?

>> No.18425128 [View]
File: 34 KB, 474x628, Schmitt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18425128

>>18425045
Clearly it is.
If power is also weakness and equality then it may as well be nothing. That is the problem with being anti-essentialist, where there's no distinction there can be no form of even the lowest qualities or values, let alone something complex like power.
As the Greeks, and any state theorists in our time, understood power can only begin from humility and a recognition of weakness. Nietzsche was consumed by power because he had none, and sensed that it was against his fate. That is why his philosophy of power is only from the negative, a destructive force in keeping with democracy.

Now forget your herd "you didn't read" sophistry. I read and understand things better than you ever will.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]