/lit/ - Literature

>>16662232
>he's directly responsible

He's not responsible for it, he just forecasted it

>>16658877
>If you've read The Sound and the Fury fewer than two times, you must leave this thread.

Why would I read a shitty book twice? It's pretty facile to defend a dubious work by merely insisting that it must be read X number of times before it may be comprehended. If a book needs to be re-read before it's coherent, perhaps that says more about the author than it does about the reader.