/lit/ - Literature

>>23041870

>Jesus is...le bad!

>>14516907
>the negrification of American English is obviously done with (((certain))) goals in mind

Are /pol/locks the biggest midwits on the internet?

>>13779497
>Because violence and fighting break a man they don’t make him.

blames the bourgeoisie for everything with no evidence and bases his economic beliefs on a retarded assumption that cant be demonstrated, gets called a deep and innovative philosopher for some reason. absolutely bluepilled

>>12603921
>implying there exist universal standards which aren't modulated by preferences
See pic. I might allow mathematics or the sciences to be "universal standards" in the Kantian sense that they are objectively true of experience rather than things-in-themselves. However, the idea that such a thing as history could be judged by "universal standards" is almost ridiculous, as our postmodern friends have amply demonstrated.

>>11504621
>>11504845
Proof?

>>11499592
>aristotle
>champion of anarchy

>>10790859
provide evidence

>>10688481
He’s not even saying anything new anon

>>10045270

>>10023386
>the data shows that a child is best raised by a man and a woman

>>10012015

>>9999786
>uniquely European sense of individualism

>>9969461
>miderate pipe smokers live longer than NON-smokers

>>9696076
>/mu/
>good taste in music
Their charts are okay. Their taste is garbage outside of /classical/ and /bleep/

Does the NRx stuff have any intellectual value or is it just an ebin internet meme?

What does /lit/ think about this guide to philosophy?

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhilosophyFAQ/comments/4ifqi3/im_interested_in_philosophy_where_should_i_start/

>>6884688
>It was all in his head!

>>6330724
>Morals do exist though

>>4937458
>human nature at changed drastically
empty declarative statement.
>things change and the reasons change
empty declarative statement.

> things have fucking changed drastically and we have as well
empty declarative statement.

>Things are only going to get much more different in the future
empty declarative statement/ unlikely future prediction with no basis other than former empty declarative statement.

>stop trying to make assumptions on the past and the future from your small experiences in life
ad hominem.

>your banal approach to life
ad hominem

>as if nothing has ever changed
empty declarative statement.

>You're a boring person with a boring outlook on life
Ad hominem.

10/10 arguing, would debate again.

So instead of pulling all these opinions completely out of your ass and not backing them up with anything other than personal insults, why not give a few examples? Can you back up any of your statements with a single fact (and while you are at it, also answer my earlier question that I posed to point out yet *another* one of your empty declarative statements - the question which you conveniently ignored to write that very convincing post of yours?) No? Thought so.

>mfw