/lit/ - Literature

>>19755689
What's your answer to this simple problem? Oh wait let me guess

God is Evil

>>19020132
>uhh god isn't responsible for evil but indirectly creates it but wait no actually evil doesn't exist and suffering is uhh...
We're reaching levels of cope that shouldn't be possible.

>>18937732
>muh monism
>dude evil doesn't actually exist lmao
Fuck off

Is this the neognostic general?

>>18896955
Abraxas is not the High God, Abraxas is the Mixture, compare here Laruelle:

>One axiom of this essay is that true duality, that which is irreducible to metaphysical Unity, is not dualism but assumes that the ‘first principle’ is the One as separated by immanence from Being and from every form of unity.

>It then leaves Being a ‘second principle’ which will be the autonomous possibility of evil and mixture.

>Duality is properly that ‘of principles’, except that the One is not a principle, and consequently the other side is that of principles, that is to say of the Principle of Sufficient Philosophy.

>Duality of the WITHOUT-PRINCIPLE and of THE PRINCIPLE, that is the key to the most radical heresy, which is not dualism exactly.

With Jung:

>Abraxas is effect. Nothing standeth opposed to it but the ineffective; hence its effective nature freely unfoldeth itself. The ineffective is not, therefore resisteth not. Abraxas standeth above the sun and above the devil. It is improbable probability, unreal reality.

The True God is the inner Abraxas or inner Star, the dormant cosmogonic power on which your being is premised and which can't help but be passed latently onto you.

Jung is Left-Handed and omega-oriented. The final stanzas are basically his crack at Amaranth theory, of becoming an Amaranth: a God of the Sheer Encounter.

What are the best arguments FOR gnosticism?

Why do christcucks suffer from Stockholm syndrome

>>17445829
>>17445858
cringe. nice dualism of non-dualism and less correct views of reality though, shame if someone came along and gnosticized it

You don't actually believe we need evil to know good, do you /lit/?