/lit/ - Literature

>>19064536

>>14778533
Not him, but virtually nobody is. “Socialism” translates to open borders and corporate welfare with some expansions to entitlement programs, so I don’t know, really.
>>14778537
Whoops! Lol!

>>14651867
>wHaT aRe (((We))) MiSsInG?

I'm really afraid for the planet. Even if we assume that all the scientists and governments are faking climate change there is still the problem of resource consumption.

Even in my own life I've seen forests and lakes destroyed and how much garbage people make. It's not sustainable. Go to where they bury trash (I went as a kid) and tell me this shit is good. But then there is the bigger issue, what happens when all the indians and chinese want to live like westerners? Do we just say no? The amount of destruction from that and pollution would go well byond the tipping point. But over population isn't the problem. Consumption is.

But that leads me tot the biggest problem, is it capitalisms fault? And if it is then wjhat's the solution. The mainstream parties don't even have one. Dems are just like "lol solar power and shit". But that fails to address the systematic problems. Repubs don't even want to address it. Then is the fucking answer revolution? Because something has to change in the next 50 years.

Also anyone think we've hit late stage capitalism? I was looking at the composition of major industries and their all crazy centralized now. 5 companies for ALL media. And young people are more disillusioned by capitalism than ever.