/lit/ - Literature

>>6940255

MORE REGARDING THE FIRST ITEM:

INCIDENTALLY, THE INVASION OF THE SOVIET UNION OCCURRED BEFORE BOTH, THE UNITEDSTATES, AND THE SOVIET UNION, OFFICIALLY JOINED THE WAR; AT THAT TIME ADOLF HITLER WAS STILL HOPING FOR GREAT BRITAIN TO CHANGE ITS POSITION REGARDING A MUTUAL ALLIANCE BETWEEN THEM.

GREAT BRITAIN, ET ALIA, WERE "THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS" RELATIVE TO THE SOVIET UNION; ADOLF HITLER KNEW THAT IF GREAT BRITAIN, ET ALIA, WERE DEFEATED, HE WOULD BE LEFT ALONE, AND DEPLETED, AGAINST THE SOVIET UNION WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THE CONFLICT WAITING FOR THE OTHER PARTIES TO EITHER MUTUALLY DESTROY THEMSELVES, OR BECOME EXHAUSTED, THUS SUBSEQUENTLY EFFORTLESSLY TAKE OVER THE WORLD.

>"It all moved. Nothing was forever."

ON THE CONTRARY, ONLY THAT WHICH REMAINS STATIC IS EPHEMERAL; THAT WHICH IS IN CONSTANT MOTION IS VIRTUALLY ENDLESS.

I AM "INTP".

http://ryzhknd.tumblr.com/psy

http://ryzhknd.tumblr.com/pol

>>5152323
>"WRITING CHARACTERS".

ARE YOU A PREMODERNIST?

>>5147202

FIRST WAVE: CIRCA YEAR NINETEEN EIGHTYTWO TO NINETEEN NINETYFIVE.

SECOND WAVE: CIRCA YEAR NINETEEN NINETYEIGHT TO TWOTHOUSAND FOUR.

THIRD WAVE: CIRCA YEAR TWOTHOUSAND TEN -.

HELLO?

HELLO.

I HAVE A HYPOTHESIS THAT MIGHT EXPLAIN WHY JEROME DAVID SALINGER MADE “HOLDEN CAULFIELD” –AND HIS FAMILY– A “GINGER”, AND WHY AYN RAND MADE “HOWARD ROARK” AN “ORANGEHEAD”.

SIMILARITIES BETWEEN “HOLDEN CAULFIELD”, AND “HOWARD ROARK”:

>THEY HAVE “REDDISH”/”ORANGE” HAIR COLOUR.
>THEIR FIRST NAMES BEGIN WITH THE LETTER “H”.
>THEY ARE OVERLY INDIVIDUALISTIC; EGOTISTS.
>THEY ARE ANOMALIES IN THEIR RESPECTIVE HABITATS.
>THEY SMOKE.
>THEY DRINK ALCOHOL.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN “HOLDEN CAULFIELD”, AND “HOWARD ROARK”:

>”HOLDEN CAULFIELD” IS HYPEREMOTIONAL.
>”HOWARD ROARK” IS HYPOEMOTIONAL.

>”HOLDEN CAULFIELD” IS OVERLY CONCERNED WITH OTHER PERSONS’ BEHAVIOR.
>”HOWARD ROARK” IS INDIFFERENT TOWARD OTHER PERSONS.

>”HOLDEN CAULFIELD” IS A TRADITIONALIST WHO DISLIKES CHANGE.
>”HOWARD ROARK” IS A PROGRESSIVIST WHO DESPISES STAGNATION.

>”HOLDEN CAULFIELD” WANTS TO PRESERVE.
>”HOWARD ROARK” WANTS TO REFORM.

THEY ARE OPPOSITE FACETS OF THE SAME ARCHETYPAL QUALITY; “THE EGO”.

"HOLDEN CAULFIELD" FITS THE "INNOCENT" ARCHETYPE.

"HOWARD ROARK" FITS THE "HERO" ARCHETYPE.

"HOLDEN CAULFIELD" REPRESENTS THE "SATTVA" (PURITY) "GUNA" OF VEDIC PHILOSOPHY.

"HOWARD ROARK" REPRESENTS THE "RAJAS" (MOTION) "GUNA" OF VEDIC PHILOSOPHY.

"HOLDEN CAULFIELD" IS VISHNU, THE PRESERVER & SUSTAINER.

"HOWARD ROARK" IS THE FOUNTAINHEAD SHIVA, THE CREATOR & DESTROYER.

HYPOTHESIS:

THE “TUATHA DE DANNAN” WERE A RACE OF NONHUMAN BEINGS, REGARDED AS DEITIES IN IRISH MYTHOLOGY. THEY ALL HAD “RED” HAIR.

JEROME DAVID SALINGER WAS FIFTY PERCENT (50%) IRISH.

PERHAPS AYN RAND, AND JEROME DAVID SALINGER, INDEPENDENTLY MADE THEIR CHARACTERS HAVE “REDDISH”/”ORANGE” HAIR, TO BE HOMOLOGOUS TO THE “TUATHA DE DANNAN”.

>>4854732
>TIRED OF READING.
>READ MORE.

DO YOU EVEN DO ANYTHING APART FROM READING?

DO YOU NOT CREATE?

DO YOU NOT MOVE?

PERSONS LIKE YOU ARE MANIFESTATIONS OF THE "LETZTE MENSCH".

READ HERAKLITUS' FRAGMENTS, AND PERHAPS YOU WILL COMPREHEND.

>>4832878
>downloading spanish accents

TO WHAT ARE YOU EVEN REFERRING?

>>4819242

WOULD YOU ASK THE SAME QUESTION IF SOMEONE WANTED TO READ "DAS KAPITAL", OR "THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO"?

>>4811586

ARE YOU THE "ORIGINAL POSTER"? IF SO, WHY ARE YOU ANNOYED AT SOMEONE SHOWING CURIOSITY REGARDING THE TOPIC OF YOUR THREAD?

>>4728921

I ALREADY TOLD YOU.

WHO ARE YOU GOING TO TRUST? ME, OR SOME ANONYMOUS NOBODY?

YOU OUGHT TO HAVE PAID ATTENTION IN SCHOOL.

>>4674664

THERE IS ALSO A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BEING "LEFT WING", AND BEING A DEGENERATE.

WHAT IS YOUR "POINT"?

>what philosophy would this system of thought fall under?

DID YOU NOT COMPREHEND WHAT YOU QUOTED?

WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY "THE MOST AESTHETIC PHILOSOPHY"?

>>4663368

"AESTHETICS" IS NOT A PHILOSOPHY; "AESTHETICS" IS A BRANCH OF PHILOSOPHY.

YOUR CONUNDRUM IS A DIRECT CONSEQUENCE OF THE CONVOLUTED HOKINESS OF YOUR STORY.

"HE WHO HUMBLETH HIMSELF", NOT "HE WHO IS HUMBLE", IDIOT.

YOU OUGHT TO IMPROVE YOUR "READING COMPREHENSION".

FEIGNING A HUMBLE CHARACTER IMPLIES REGARDING HUMBLENESS AS A VIRTUE –IT IS NOT– WHICH ITSELF IMPLIES THAT ONE FINDS EXALTATION IN BASENESS, WHICH IMPLIES THAT ONE IS SPIRITUALLY, MENTALLY, AND/OR PHYSICALLY CORRUPT.

>>4615008

HELLO?

CARTHAGE WAS AN AFRICAN CIVILIZATION; CARTHAGE WAS LOCATED IN WHAT IS NOW TUNISIA, AFRICA, NOT EUROPA, AND ITS PEOPLE WERE NEGROIDS, AND MONGRELS.

>what do you think of my first article ?

WERE NOT JUST GOING TO LEAVE THIS HERE?

>>4604885

HELLO?

WHY DO YOU SKIP MINE? IS THE SUBJECT "TOO MUCH" FOR YOU?

>>4588185
>Wealth corrupts.

WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY "CORRUPTS"?

HOW DOES WEALTH "CORRUPT"?

>>4574526

WHAT KIND OF IDIOT MAKES A IMAGE IN .gif FORMAT, ONLY TO CONVERT IT TO .png?

THE LENGTH IS IRRELEVANT WHEN THE ENTIRETY OF THE CONTENT IS SPURIOUS ARGUMENTS, FLAWED PREMISES, AND FALLACIES.