[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.14939368 [View]
File: 444 KB, 347x485, 3947295232.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14939368

>>14939330
>>non dualism is based based based
>>>dualism is stupid
based!

>> No.14708297 [View]
File: 444 KB, 347x485, 3947295232.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14708297

Very nice book which may be of interest to my based fellow Trad anons

https://www2.uned.es/dpto-hdi/History%20of%20Non-dual%20Meditation%20Methods.pdf

>> No.14663495 [View]
File: 444 KB, 347x485, 3947295232.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14663495

>>14663413
>Why should I read him, not just the traditional writers themselves that he recommends?
It's good that you are asking this question because it seems that I sometimes see people get too hung up on them and never read much of the source material which often goes way deeper into metaphysics etc than Guenon et al ever do in their books. I would say that Guenon and the other traditionalists have interesting and insightful things to say about the present world, and also that just reading a few of their books can often be a good introduction to and a springboard for getting deep into the writings of the various traditions. Things like reading a few of Guenon's books before studying Hinduism, reading Burckheart before reading Sufi stuff, reading Borella before the Christian metaphysicians and mystics medieval era and antiquity, and so on.

>> No.14617112 [View]
File: 444 KB, 347x485, 3947295232.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14617112

okay this fucking slaps

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]