/lit/ - Literature

>>16541591
>dude has a castle in England, a traceable family lineage and is ultra wealthy now with a massive private library
So are the jews which bought up the old european aritocracy. Look up where the Rothschild live in england. There is a reason why financial means alone only make you rich and not an aristocrat.

Although I have to concede that he certainly seems as inbreed. Every time we both argue, he looks like a buffoon unironically on par with gutterfly. But that should be expected if someone as wealthy as him has to try and look for approval, not with his peers, but with a bunch of kids and wagies on a jugoslavian kefir bulb exchange website.

>>16454240
You only prefer animals, ecause you can't hndle your peers. Same reason why betas go to some asian country. They can't compete with their native people for a woman, so they have to go to some shithole where they seem like a God, by mere existance. That's what you do with a dog. You excues your ehaviour in their superior loyality, just like yellow fever victims claim that's the only traditional women left. Both are delusional and full of copium.

You are taking a lower animal to surrogate emotions which you can't get from your peers.

>>16448558
I'm currently reading Eugen Onegin, Tomans Don Juan and Manns Untertan. Just ordered Ariosts Orlando Furioso and the two volume edition of The Golden Bought by Frazer. How you would think that I don't read, because we don't seem to share interests and despite you not even being able to read barely any titles, is beyond me.

>>13996262
Not him but nothing he said is false. Cultural changes happen far beyond the scope of a single meme board. And besides the usual brainlets, nobody "detests" people advocating their believes in a sane manner, even tho a loud minority like yourself thinks that you can speak for a whole board, trying to bully people which views you don't like out of here. This is pathetic and per definition counter-intelectual, which for the expent needs to face uncomfortable views. I've read many times on here that said anons read Malcoml Xs bio or some Jews Lit to actually form their own opinion. Even obvious propaganda liek Gould or Diamond, yet I haven't seen the same being done by those criticising works like Culture of Critique. It's all kvetching.

tl;dr: Do not speak for all of us. if you can't keep up, maybe switch to /his/.

>>11808774
Considering how it's mostly womynz getting vulgar on other women online, you're either an effeminate bitchtits owner or a politically illiterate cumbucket. Pick your poison.

>>11806072
>stuffing 3000 years in one line, without even mentioning Herodot
>giving the later 500 years it's own without mentioning Libido Dominandi
>making TWO WHOLE LINES on a single war
>seeing the second world war only from the fashy/ bolshewic lense
>1 1/2 lines of minorities
This is one of the worst lists I have ever seen. Pure popular history for people not really interested in history.

>>11788370
You mentioned other windows (in the flat) not in the same room, a big difference, and I don't realy believe you, as it's pretty uncommon to have two in a small room. But whatever.

>you tell me mr circulation
Circulation of air can only happen if the window is actually fully open, not about there beeing "air" between the window and the bookcase. Good lord, I'm realyl trying to help you punk out.

>you're really putting too much effort into this
Yeah, it's not like I could have suspected much after seeing bookcases as curtain surrogates.

>>11777036
Good lord, you have to be retarded to not understand that what SA is and that they are using the same data I can't instantly provide. I am actually coming from the point of honesty, opening admitting that I can't just find it, while providing an articile using the same or similar source while also using other data playing in and showing a similar correlation. Meanwhile lefties, as always, only interpret honsty as a weakness to be exploited and trashtalked down as lies and ill will. Speak about projection. That's why there is no possibility for a fruitfull discusion with you people. First you get personal, than you make people look for eternity for every source - while not even beeing interested enough in it to read it - hoping that they can't find it right know, stopping the discussion like a kike and if they provide it you either move the goalpoint or simply stop responding. Every anon which been there knows what I am speaking about.

I mean, just from an logical point, nothing else would make sense in evolutionary terms. But that's not what you and your ideology of the gaps is about, right?

>>11772645
>10 seconds for a page
Anybody without a photographic memory (which is a meme outside of savanges which are retarded in any other cognitive ability) would be hardpressed to even follow eah line with ones eyes in such a short time, without even understanding the words. Dude is a typical lying kike. He prolly simply skims through the book only looking for certain buzzwords. A disgrace for any reader.

>>11726122
Alcohol will prevent you from absorbing any insight and once you wake up the next day you will barely remember what you read due to alcohol shutting off the ability to biuld new neural memory bridges.

Weed isn't better either as it prevents you from thinking clearly and pomotes "circle think". You might enjoy both while reading but it's pretty useless if you actually want to enjoy the book and not the drug.

Coffeein, especially in black and green tea (which doesn't make you as tingly as coffee) will prevent you fom getting tires as quickly on your eyes and have longer enjoyment time.

>>11690497
>saving the image instead of the text which is full of links
Yeah, how about you go fuck yourself in the ass, hm?

>>11689846
>someone put in relation the critique I posted
>that means he's a bootlicker for said writer
Your two digits IQ is showing, Moshe.

>>11665457
>asking for a /lit/ recommendation
>reeee it has nothing to do with /lit/

>>11663367
I'm a married neo-boomer woman and I hate women since I can remember for beeing retarded as a whole and backstabbing cunts. Women are like migrants. Nobody would make such a big fuzz if they would at least be gratefull for how they get everything served on a silver tabled by white men with scar ridden hands. There is nothing worse than loud cumbuckets "writers" kvetching for more attention.

>>11657870
>It is good that people die, so the population can evolve and everyone having enough resources.
>"So ya sayin, killing people is good? Checkmate theist!"

>>11641314
>>11641323
I wasn't even expecting a book, but surely just scanning it in, in whatever quality just for the story alone would be a good option. I thought maybe someone had uploaded it to archive.com butI guess they and the (((Museums)) were to concerned with making money off some poor dude than to simply make his work accesible.