/lit/ - Literature

My diary, desu.

>It is completely obvious to anyone (unless you're a woman) that

>>16577986
Return to Tradition

>>16507944
>Honestly, I think it's just inherently not very masculine to try to "reclaim your masculinity".
You can't get where you're going if you don't even define the end goal. On some level you have to acknowledge there are qualities specific to being a man, and then work at developing them. You may feel shame for having that lack in the first place, but that's beside the point, and really there's no shame in taking what's rightfully yours.

>Politics? Doesn't matter, the only thing that matters is your stance on the nature of the spiritual and material.

>Every human being not going to the extreme limit, is a servant or the enemy of man, and accomplice to a nameless obscenity

>if the genera are in the highest degree principles, whether should one regard the first of the genera as principles, or those which are predicated directly of the individuals? This also admits of dispute. For if the universal is always more of a principle, evidently the uppermost of the genera are the principles; for these are predicated of all things. There will, then, be as many principles of things as there are primary genera, so that both being and unity will be principles and substances; for these are most of all predicated of all things. But it is not possible that either unity or being
should be a genus of things; for the differentiae of any genus must each of them both have being and be one, but it is not possible for the genus to be predicated of the differentiae taken apart from the species (any more than for the species of the genus to be predicated of the proper differentiae of the genus); so that if unity or being is a genus, no differentia will either be one or have being. But if unity and being are not genera, neither will they be principles, if the genera are the principles.—Again, the intermediate classes, whose concepts include the differentiae, will on this theory be genera, down to the individuals; but as it is, some are thought to be genera and others are not thought to be so. Besides this, the differentiae are principles even more than the genera; and if these also are principles, there comes to be practically an infinite number of principles, especially if we suppose the highest genus to be a principle.—But again, if unity is more of the nature of a principle, and the indivisible is one, and everything indivisible is so either in quantity or in species, and that which is so in species is prior to the divisible, and genera are divisible into species (for man is not the genus of individual men), that which is predicated directly of the individuals will have more unity

>>16320416
Embrace being a lost cause, and take the monkpill. You don't have to waste your time pleasing anyone, so focus on yourself. Look into spirituality, or anything that can take your mind off the material world and society's autistic obsession with sex. Find something that's meaningful, like taking care of a pet, even if it's just to yourself. If you reduce your existence to what women think of you, and you're not a Chad, of course you'd want to kill yourself.

>>16308952
>implying the """high class""" still exists

>>16290196
Well, reading has benefited me immensily, I polished my vocabulary, and improved my comprehension of other languages and cultures, to be fair, I also find reading fiction to be very entertaining, it's like i'm a passenger that for a small period of time travels through worlds beyond wonder, experiencing the possibilites of human and inhuman existence.

>Why yes, I am the one that bumps the dead spanish literature general on /lit/, how could you tell?

>>16275073
Just use Bayes's theorem.

>albricias
>feligrés
>os

>>16239888
Holy based and checked.

>>16224728
>wonder what you people actually get out of literature
I'm reading aristotles physics, off yourself tranny

>It's W.D Ross for me

>>16223999
check and based

>>16209522
>God lied when He said He was alone. His lies are not out of malice, but out of fear of the others.
>Picture in your mind what God could possibly be afraid of.