/lit/ - Literature

>>18707430
>you know the name you called me? g-guess what, its actually you!!!!
I'm shaking in my boots at your hard-hitting reversal.
>As devout as you may be, you seem to have skipped Matthew 7:5
Why is it always the anti-Christs who are telling people how to be a better Christian? Focus on yourself.
>Your obsession with monarchist nomenclature gives you away as a teenager.
I guess Jesus was also obsessed with monarchist nomenclature when He said "my kingdom is not of this world". What do you call somebody who rules a kingdom?

>>18346293
I mean the church created by Jesus Christ in Matthew 16:18, which compiled the Holy Scriptures in the Council of Rome 382. Individuals within an institution performing unethical actions does not invalidate the fact that Jesus Christ created this church. "For it must needs be that scandals come: but nevertheless woe to that man by whom the scandal cometh."

I hope you open your eyes, eventually. Until then, enjoy the New Testament we gave to you, friend, and hopefully you will soften your heart and allow God to guide you, and not your own pride and ego.

>>18283187
>Contrary to popular belief, Sassanids were proselytizing. Zoroastrianism would have melded better with European myths and had a better effect than Christianity.
This is your hypothesis. It does not deny the obvious reality that the Christianization of Europe was a direct causal factor in its cultural domination.
>The key fact is an explicit moral dualism that privileges virtue over vice,
Again, the important factor of Christianity being "moral dualism", rather than a complex theology based on self-sacrifice in the model of Jesus Christ, is just your opinion.
>You have no ancestral connections to Jesus. He was a Levantine.
Did I say anything about ancestral connection? What I said was, and I repeat:
"Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ is the faith of YOUR forefathers".
>It is only due to historical contingencies pertaining to geopolitics you became Christian
Literally as wrong as you could possibly be. I am only bringing this up to show you that your postulation "Not a single value thing (sic) has come from the Semites" is woefully false.
>something totally meaningless: Christ.
Your (poor, and misguided) opinion. I will pray for you.

>>18283209
If somebody, through no fault of their own, has not been contacted of the Gospel, they are judged based upon their adherence to the natural law (which is instantiated through the human conscience). See >>18283082