/lit/ - Literature

>>17665554
Unfolding these thoughts further

> There is a "given" [the given is not (yet) object]
> The "given" is subject to local autopoiesis, leading to the emergence of interiority/exteriority.
> Thus part of this "given" can be put in position relative to other parts based on this dichotomy.
> The conjunction of the particularities of the autopoeisis of two given and their relationship based on their relative position to one another constitute the relational point-of-view of those givens.
> Objectivity constitutes itself from a comprehensive systematization of point-of-views. [Objectivity is not a pole in a dichotomy with subjectivity, but an early (earlier) step of the process of the given being shaped into the world]
-> Objectivity is not the system of facts, but the system of givens as given to each other and maintained as such. Particulars, Universals, difference and iteration (etc.) emerges from the holistic state-of-affairs of the given. [The given is (now) an object)
-> There is a 'not-given'. [We must here distinguish between the given and both the not-given as hidden and the not-given as taken]
-> The not-given, subject to the same local autopoiesis as the given, the the same relational point-of-views system of positioning (although here as 'point-of-concealments) Mark's the limits of objectivity, neither as outside or inside of it.
-> The conjunction of the given and not-given as hidden of an object and its relationship based on the point-of-views and points-of-concealments of other objects relative to it constitutes the eidetic relativity of the given for (parts of) itself.
-> Subjectivity constitutes itself from the system of point-of-views and that of the eidetic relativity of the given.

>>17070459

Well, we turned lusting over brown pussy into an aesthetical mouvement.