/lit/ - Literature

>>22491843
Says the cowardly spineless faggot who rambles on about blond beasts, eugenics, Rome vs Judea, war being good, and then backs off and goes insane when people take his ideas seriously.

>"Hegel, installed from above, by the powers that be, as the certified Great Philosopher, was a flat-headed, insipid, nauseating, illiterate charlatan, who reached the pinnacle of audacity in scribbling together and dishing up the craziest mystifying nonsense. This nonsense has been noisily proclaimed as immortal wisdom by mercenary followers and readily accepted as such by all fools, who thus joined into as perfect a chorus of admiration as had ever been heard before. The extensive field of spiritual influence with which Hegel was furnished by those in power has enabled him to achieve the intellectual corruption of a whole generation."

Women are overrated.

>>20925557
>This seems really cool and easy to grasp. I'm really interested in the concept of will in particular and how he talks about suffering. Do his works have beautiful poetic passages akin to Nietzsche, Bataille and Land? Where should I start if I decide to start reading his works?

begin with:
>a critique of pure reason by kant
>Parerga and Paralipomena by Schop
>in the fourfold root of the principle of sufficient reason

Then:
>the world as will and representation by Schop
>the wisdom of life by Schop
>on the basis of morality by Schop
>on the freedom of the will by Schop

For lulz
>on women
>the art of being right

>Hegel, installed from above, by the powers that be, as the certified Great Philosopher, was a flat-headed, insipid, nauseating, illiterate charlatan, who reached the pinnacle of audacity in scribbling together and dishing up the craziest mystifying nonsense.

Anything and everything by this gentleman

>>19642239
>Now, it is only an absolute pauper who has such a thorough conviction of his own complete, profound and positive inferiority from every point of view, of his own utter insignificance
and worthlessness, that he can take his place quietly in the political machine.

>He is the only one who can keep on bowing low enough, and even go right down upon his face if necessary; he alone can submit to everything and laugh at it; he alone knows the entire worthlessness of merit; he alone
uses his loudest voice and his boldest type whenever he has to speak or write of those who are placed over his head, or occupy any position of influence; and if they do a little scribbling, he is ready to applaud it as a masterwork. He alone understands how to beg, and so betimes, when he is hardly out of his boyhood, he becomes a high priest of that hidden mystery which Goethe brings to light.

>>18952934
Yes. The Will to Shitpost is the noumenon.

>>18950378
This. Read the irrefutable Schoppy.

>>18900742
>kant?
more like I kant be bothered

>>18879423
>fixes kant

>>18795398
The only non-Greek worth reading is Schopenhauer.

>>18714968

I'm reading Schop all day, and will be posting parts I like here. These are all from the essay 'On the Suffering of the World'. Enjoy.

On Pain > pleasure
>Whoever wants to summarily test the assertion that the pleasure in the world outweighs the pain, or at any rate that the two balance each other, should compare the feeling of an animal that is devouring another, with those of that other.

Schop roasting NPCs
>In almost all cases their intellect is barely sufficient for the service fo their Will

>Time is like a taskmaster with a whip

>Life is suffering, Nevertheless everyone wants to reach old age and thus a state of life where it may be said: 'it is bad today, and every day will get worse until the worst of all happens'.

>we can also regard our life as a uselessly disturbing episode in the blissful repose of nothingness.

>Whoever lives two or three generations feels like the spectator who, during the fair, sees the performances of all kinds of jugglers and, if he remains seated in the booth, sees them repeated two or three times. as the tricks were meant only for the performance, they no longer make an impression after the illusion and novelty have vanished.

>I suppose I shall have to be told again that my philosophy is cheerless and comfortless simply because I tell the truth, whereas people want to hear that the Lord has made things very well.

>this is Samsara, therefore what better things can you expect?

>“The conviction that the world, and therefore man too, is something which really ought not to exist is in fact calculated to instil in us indulgence towards one another: for what can be expected of beings placed in such a situation as we are? From this point of view one might indeed consider that the appropriate form of address between man and man ought to be, not monsieur, sir, but fellow sufferer, compagnon de misères. However strange this may sound it corresponds to the nature of the case, makes us see other men in a true light and reminds us of what are the most necessary of all things: tolerance, patience, forbearance and charity, which each of us needs and which each of us therefore owes.”

Do Nietzsches and Schopenhauers virginities discredit their philosophies?