/lit/ - Literature

>>1798678
No problem.

I deleted my previous post because I didn't realize that Tao's Lin 2nd most recent post on twitter, which I saw just now, was about a thread on /lit/.

Reported for being viral advertisement by Tao Lin.

>>1784230
If it's on his twitter, then look here: http://twitter.com/#!/tao_lin

If if it's on /lit/, then look here: http://green-oval.net/cgi-board.pl/lit/

In other words. Do your own work.

ITT: People and OP who don't realize anyone can get "doubles" at anytime on /lit/ since it's so slow moving and by using the "doubles" script which autoposts for you when it would be "doubles"

In short, >>1777400 was not a random occurrence and Tybrax is probably OP as well.

In other words, he set himself up for the win.

No, there is the nothing like comics in the sense of every single thing being retconned on a consistent and predictable schedule.

Really?
No one has pointed out that OP should have used "complement" rather than "compliment".

Though I'm sure the latter could be very possible as well.

My current plan is to read a bit and try to keep the book evenly paced with the series and vice versa.

That way I can compare them quite easily and see if they do it the way I imagine it happening when I read.

It may not be the best way to do it, but it's the way I'm doing it.