/lit/ - Literature

>>22779285
>he thinks it's about the wrist and not the 20+ posts sperging like a retard
I thought you said you were smart?

>mfw I read it at all those places and more
it's a long book so I read it frequently. That way I wouldn't spend the whole year on it.
Have people forgotten that reading is an individual experience and people open a book in public simply because they want to read the book at that moment?

Something Something Lend-lease

>>22357569
a priori meaning, and not just that but also analytic...anon, did you even graduate?

Do you anons ever listen to any literary podcasts or audio dramas?

>>21550930

Then he fucked up
Really, really bad

>>20508101
>He ought to have made himself acquainted with the teaching of Confucius or the Buddhists; that would have calmed him down

>>20109323
if you weren't 5 iq faggot you would just transcribe the video using YouTube and ctrl+f 4chan and you would immediately find out. No wonder dumb people have no time for shit they dumb fr

if you unironically "believe" in the bible, have "faith" in "god", or any other nonsense like that for more than a brief period of time, you've failed a critical thinking test and will permanently remain a retarded slave. pic related

>>20010684
>>uuuuhhhh let me acquire as much knowledge as possible but limited by weight, light levels ,weather conditions, money, availability, not looking like a faggot reading schizo bullshit in public, not looking like a faggot in general

I bought mine 2 months ago and haven't deliberately plugged it into a socket yet. It just charges every time I upload pirated ebooks onto it from my pc.

People like to think that this guy lost all credibility when he went batshit after his benzos withdrawal. Real chads realised he was a fraud all along when his one and only offspring turned out to be a whore
>"b-but all women are whores s-she's just a product of her environment!"
Bullshit

>>19364791
>makes the core strength of the material really shine

>>19361098
leave to it to the self-help enjoyer to be in a lonely, shitty place in life and give directions

>>19354705
>(You)
Amuro Ray
>(Us)
Quatro Bajeena

>>18432391
>yeah I'm being a shitty person but I won't tell you why!
Alright I guess

>>18086351
>Why did Conservatism manage to conserve absolutely nothing in the last 100 years?
>>18086374
>Conservatism has been dead since it became “liberal conservatism” aka not conservatism at all.

what fucking weak insipid nothing “hottakes”. conservative-liberal dynamic (and we can argue what it means till the cows come home, something very specific or very broad, letting people say “thats not conservatism”, this is) in its broadest sense is just the general bilateral oriented disposition of a society in its specific context at the time. >“conserve nothing”
nigger, are you not speaking the english language? are we not in institutions hundreds of years old? its not some zero sum game that every point of change is inescapably leaving from some sense of eternal conservatism. Every change is a continuation and a departure at once. Every shift of the status quo is a slight reorientation of what is liberal and conservative in itself.

You could just as easily flip the rhetorical thought on its head and say that liberalism has liberalised nothing in the past 100 years. just regigered the same political thought in new paint, just reusing christian ethics in a different angle, perputuating the same systems.

they just keep loosing. just some gay as narativisation of linear progression where this is obviously correct and progressing, while this is obviously dieng.

conservatism doesnt die as long as there is an implicit idea of something to conserve. The predilection, just like its relitive liberalism is inherent in society after the fact. In a socialist country there will be conservative socialists and liberals. in the roman republic there are conservatives and liberals.

conservatism doesnt exist without liberalism and liberalism doesnt exist without conservatism.

>>18067462

>>18056478
Leave it to Americans to take everything literally and embarrass themselves by making threads like these.

>>17960010
>>17960011
>>17960901
Keep seething revisionist-cucks, if you truly gave a fuck about this or if it actually existed you’d have the sources at hand.

I hope he never releases another book

>>17812113
>these kinds of retards think they sound smart when they spout this pseud bullshit

>>17812185
Don’t get excited, wrong pic.

>>16097074
>appreciation
No.
He was a drunk, obnoxious, contrarian hack, utterly overrated by American liberals and their exhippy ilk because it appeals to their narrow worldview. Fuck him. Burroughs and even Ginsberg were better beats.

>>12095467
Are you actually citing Titus Andronicus to criticize Shakespeare? Brainlet identified.