/lit/ - Literature

>>23299365
this one is good, assuming you haven't read it

>>23293303

It's the Jews.

>>19757634
Adorn forget to read up on the Freemasons too

>>19511950
>>19511981
>>19512067
It's a long, tedious, mentally draining read. And it's supposed to, it's a filter. You need to be heavily motivated to put the time and energy into reading about and comprehending all this information Most people don't have that. I'm not trying to sound superior. Even I had to take long breaks since I have a job and the book is so information dense it would give me headaches trying to finish a single chapter after coming back from my 9-5.
Instead anons start a dozen threads a month about picrel, which is half filled with fake quotes and unverified information that go nowhere. But hey it caters to midwits who think they can absorb centuries of clandestine operations and navigate complex webs of unknown activity through a grade school-tier book (oh and look at that based and redpilled cover!) so those threads get hundreds of replies. Every time I tell people to read Quigley instead - no response.

I've started thinking picrel is unironically shilled so people avoid trying to read Tragedy and Hope along with The Anglo-American Establishment and The Creature from Jekyll Island. Clinton was Quigley's best student and directly quoted Tragedy and Hope along with by name at his DNC speech. Why? Because he understood what 99% of people couldn't. And was smart enough to join the 1% to exploit it. Can't blame him desu. You don't need to hide a book that already filters most readers out there. I've just stopped caring.

...

“The imperial democracy that held the world beneath its sway, from the senators who bore historic names down to the humblest tiller of the soil, from Julius Caesar down to the smallest shopkeeper in the back streets of Rome, was at the mercy of a small group of usurers,” as quoted in G. Ferrero, Greatness and Decline of the Roman Empire, Vol. vi, William Heinemann Ltd, London, 1908, 223.
Cannot find the source for this quote, don’t think this series of Roman history books has a vol 6.
Also this guy makes some wild claims with no evidence, like saying slaves in late Rome outnumbered citizens 5 to 1. Should I keep reading this shit?

is this book any good or is it just spergery about da joos

>it's literally all (Their) fault
huh..I'm not even a poltard but this makes some pretty convincing arguments.

Pic related and the documentary "money as debt" were my introductions to economics.

What should I read now? How do I free my nation from the clutches of international banking?

Pls and thank you

Pic related and the docukejtary "money as debt" were my introductions to economics.

What should I read now? How do I free my nation from the clutches of international banking?

>>18138938
A History of Central Banking is more exciting,

While the discord trannies talk to themselves, remember to get this book before it doesn't exist in stores anymore.

>Furthermore, Strakosch paid the debts of Winston Churchill and from that moment the history of the world would embark on a tragic course: a world war in the service of international finance that would destroy the British and all other European empires, to be replaced by a money empire, while Roosevelt laid down the post-war conditions to the hapless Churchill for the dismantling of the British Empire.[17]

>Goodson traces the origins of the Great Depression as an example of credit manipulation, and profiles those who sought an alternative: C. H. Douglas of social credit, Professor Irving Fisher, and Gottfried Feder, Germany’s primary banking reformer campaigner.[18] The innovative reforms undertaken by the Nazis were undermined by Hjalmar Schacht, president of the Reichsbank, an intimate of the international banking fraternity who was to be spared the fate of other high state officials at Nuremberg due to his connections, including particularly his friendship with Montague Norman, Governor of the Bank of England.

>Goodson proceeds to outline the many socio-economic achievements of the Hitler regime, such a low-interest loans for housing and the barter system that saw Germany capturing markets from Europe to South America, and undermining the system of international finance around the world, the rise in income, the great public works while, persistent claims to the contrary, expenditure on arms was relatively low.

>While Germany flourished in the midst of a world depression, Fascist Italy had already embarked on a similar course a decade previously, with giant public works, and gradually adopted state banking. Japan, which readers might be surprised to learn, had since the 1920s had been widely attracted to the social credit theory of C. H. Douglas, followed such policies from 1932, and completed its reforms in 1942, based on German banking legislation. This established Japan as a great economic power and in 1940 she announced the Grater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, which threatened the global economic system by creating an autarkic trading bloc.

>>18088232
Read a book, tranny. Stop getting your politics from youtube videos.

Yes, read pic related
https://counter-currents.com/2014/11/central-banking-and-human-bondage/
and read Othmar Spann's history of economics

The trick to understanding economics is to deprogram yourself from believing "the economy" is some kind of abstract entity. It's like saying "the scientific sector" is an abstract thing that exists independent of specific cultures and countries, with people who may or may not be called scientists, doing what we may or may not call "science." This isn't to say that there is nothing like "science," it's to say that the abstract is always immanent in the historically and culturally concrete.

What are the real referents, the real bases of the modern "economy?" Look deeper into it and you will find: almost nothing. What was really happening during the industrial revolution was a dialectical process growth that expanded to all sectors, but that eventually ran out in the early 20th century. From there, stopgap measures have to be tried: colonisation to create new markets, the enslavement of whole countries and continents to enforce subordinate market vassalage on them, the manufacturing of industries and consumer bases. The illusion becomes more and more deranged as time goes on.

In the 1970s, real growth completely stopped. There was officially no more blood to be squeezed from the stone. For one brief moment, economies normalised and it was clearly inevitable that the finance capitalist class would dissolve and level down as there were no more massive gambles and payoffs to be made, thus no more massive fortunes. Society would have reordered itself, absorbing the lingering financial elites as no longer structurally relevant.

So what did this class do? Created the modern "finance sector," a nonsense idea grounded in nothing economically real, an illusion of infinite growth to replace the old, dead-letter industrial and colonial forms of growth. The illusion only benefits the vulture capitalist and investors who endlessly circlejerk one another while the rest of the world is kept in arrested development and allowed to rot. Again, when you are mystified by the basic high school math models of economics majors who claim to be mathematical wizards, look for the real referents and bases of the economic activity. The real base of modern finance, its fuel source, is the middle class flyover man getting slowly sucked of his energy and stagnating in 1960s wage conditions and quality of life. That's what the real economy is, underneath all the glam of "trading." A fat flyover guy wondering why he's living in the same slowly moldering conditions as he already enjoyed in 1970, why history stopped in 1970.

What is interesting about modern crypto and trading scandals is that the system is becoming so schizophrenic that it can't even throw up illusions on top of illusions anymore, now the scammers are actually having to show their hand and overtly shout for the state to protect them as the collective illusion breaks down.

>>18052285
>just stop letting it inflate
I agree wholeheartely

>>17851865
>>17851893
>>17851910
>>17851950
>>17851963
>I support the toppling, and murder, of qaddifi because he was a socialist, and no Americans don't like him because we overthrew him
Read this, you are literally agreeing with Hillary Clinton. It is not about communism vs capitalism but good guys against globalism/zionism. Both China and America are puppets of the Rothschilds, the Rothschilds have just decided its their turn to terrorize the world.

>

Why is this book banned from Amazon? It seems to have good reviews everywhere.

>>17588192
whats the definition of conspiracy? what do you mean he values traditionalism? what is the superior human? what is christ kikery?

I have just begun reading pic related and Goodson uses the expression "industrial production" referred to the Roman Empire even though there were no real industries except some some water mills, because manufacturing only appeared in the 19th century. Am I missing something?

>>16886096
What is to be done about the banks?
Any country or community of people that try to declare themself independent from the current monetary system will immediately get invaded by the U.S™
There will be another recession, a big one. That's for sure.