[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.20535909 [View]
File: 1.85 MB, 3264x1632, 01B4F2FC-6059-47D2-9146-681259BBDC92.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20535909

So /lit/ who was the wisest thinker of them all?

>> No.14090462 [View]
File: 1.85 MB, 3264x1632, forming consensus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14090462

Are you part of the forming consensus?

>> No.13953034 [View]
File: 1.85 MB, 3264x1632, forming consensus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13953034

are you part of the forming consensus

>> No.13602243 [View]
File: 1.85 MB, 3264x1632, forming consensus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13602243

is toni morrison part of the consensus?

>> No.13599258 [View]
File: 1.85 MB, 3264x1632, forming consensus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13599258

Please leave this board and never return if you agree with any of the following sentences:

>you read any form of genre fiction
>you barely know your classics
>you tend to believe that if you like a given work, it is justified on an artistic level
>you think everyone's opinion should be accepted and respected
>you speak a single language
>you read contemporary versions of Shakespeare or Milton
>you read for the plot
>you read for entertainment
>you rarely read nonfiction
>you don't have a solid grounding in philosophy
>you do not at least have some understanding of the Three Tragedians and Homer
>you have little to no understanding of literature outside of your cultural horizon
>you have little to no understanding of literature within your own cultural horizon (muh african authors)
>you mostly read contemporary literature
>you believe 'the author is dead'
>you make your literary analysis proceed from ideology
>you think intricate prose is 'pretentious' and that the author 'should just get to the point'
>your rarely read poetry
>you think Rhythm and Rhyme is just useless rules and laws restricting creativity
>you have a hard time explaining why you like a given work
>you have a hard time forming structured and relevant literary criticism
>you tend to refuse to judge works for yourself, rather relying on the opinions of literary authorities
>you rarely read for more than one or two hours straight

>> No.13577537 [View]
File: 1.85 MB, 3264x1632, forming consensus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13577537

lol?>have sex>seething>cope

>> No.13568153 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 1.85 MB, 3264x1632, forming consensus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13568153

Marvel vs. Capcom

>> No.13554986 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 1.85 MB, 3264x1632, forming consensus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13554986

wow, ive never seen it laid out like this before

>> No.13554840 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 1.85 MB, 3264x1632, forming consensus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13554840

found this on reddit, thoughts?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]