/lit/ - Literature

>>18254653
>The Greeks are the foundation of the West...


1. HELLENIC CULTURE IS THE FOUNDATION OF CATHOLICAL CIVILIZATION; ROMAN CULTURE IS ITS SUBSTRUCTURE; HISPANICAL CULTURE: ITS SUPERSTRUCTURE, AND CHRISTIANITY ITS AXIS OF FORMATION.

2. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS: «THE WEST»/«WESTERN CULTURE»/«WESTERN CIVILIZATION»; THE ACTUAL REFERENT OF THESE VAGUE, SPURIOUS TERMS IS THE PROTESTANTSPHERE.

3. THE NOTION OF A «WESTERN WORLD» CONTRASTING AN «EASTERN WORLD» IS ILLUSTRISTIC, INSUBSTANTIAL, EUROCENTRIC.

MY ONLY TEACHER IS THE TEACHER OF TEACHERS, THE VIRGIN GENETRIX OF THE NOBLE ONES, THE EMPRESS OF THE WORLD, THE EXALTED FALLEN ONE:

S O F I A .

I LISTEN TO MUSIC WHILST WRITING; I PAUSE THE MUSIC BEFORE READING WHAT I WROTE.

SOFIA SPEAKS IN MUSIC; SOFIA LISTENS IN SILENCE.

>>12054046
>people who *perpetually* criticize the Jews, simply for being Jewish.
When the left criticizes Jews for being Jewish, it is because the Jewish identity is tribalistic and thus (to those seeking reciprocity) immoral due to a refusal to work with the other nations of the world - a resistance toward undifferentiation by a group. This will to be different, to not be subject to other peoples is the expression of the Will to Power within them - I understand Nietzsche's sympathies completely.
The expression of Christianity on the contrary is a Will to Freedom for the self and the other - the elimination of the sacrifice, scapegoat, and struggle, and the creation of peace.
Here is where the difficulty comes in - how should we respond to this situation? People have been proselytizing to the Jews for centuries without success - because success would mean the end of the Jewish identity as distinct.
For those who understand both sides, there is a simultaneous tension - a will to accept and tolerate differentiation, and a will to be intolerant towards them. This goes back to what I wrote here.
>(though it is perhaps unreasonable to expect them to accept those who diverge on something like "Should I attack someone else?", hence the anxiety)
Should Christians accept anti-Christians? This is THE apocalyptic question. If the answer is no, do you not cease to be Christian? If the answer is yes, isn't the futility of Christianity revealed? It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.
What we're seeing now with Trump and idpol is the realization of that because Christianity has failed and necessarily will fail, the optimal thing to do is "Will to Power for your group" (mimesis of the Jewish strategy). This is why there are such paradoxical elements as /pol/ hating Jews and supporting Trump, who supports Jews and has a Jewish daughter.
>However, what Hegel did not see, and this is where I come to your question, is that the oscillation of contradictory positions, which become equivalent, can very well go to extremes. Adversaries can very well become hostile, and alternation can lead to reciprocity. Hegelian thought has tragic aspects, but no catastrophic ones. It thus goes from dialectic to reconciliation, from reciprocity to relationship, in a very confident manner, often by seeming to forget where it in fact comes from.
(My respect for Girard skyrocketted after reading this btw)
And so it is that the refusal of the Jews to convert to Christianity has turned the world from one seeking undifferentiation to one seeking complete differentiation. What is the solution? Optimality.
>The identity of all humans, which Hegel thought would lead to common understanding, will in fact drive them ever further apart.
Idpol is here to stay, unless you're willing to give a different answer to The Apocalyptic Question - unless you're willing to choose to embrace paradox and hypocrisy, or to wait (indefinitely).

>>11864954

?

1. JESUS WAS NEITHER JEWISH, NOR A RABBI.

2. JESUS COMMANDED HIS DISCIPLES TO INSTRUCT OTHERS IN HIS DOCTRINE, BUT HE WOULD NOT HAVE APPROVED OF THE FORMALIZATION OF IT INTO A RELIGION, AND HE CERTAINLY WOULD NOT HAVE TOLERATED THE JEWISH PERVERSION THAT IS JUDEOCHRISTIANITY.

>>11863968

BELIEF IN GOD IS SOMETHING IMMANENT; NOONE CAN BE CONVINCED OF GOD'S BEING, NOR BE MADE TO BELIEVE IN GOD, IF THAT ONE LACKS NOBILITY; THE NOBLE ONES DO NOT NEED TO BE CONVINCED OF GOD'S BEING, NOR BE MADE TO BELIEVE, BECAUSE THEY ALREADY BELIEVE.

>>11825508

THE HOLY SPIRIT IS SEXLESS AND GENDERLESS, AS IS GOD; SOFIA IS AN AION, NOT THE HOLY SPIRIT, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT IS AKIN TO A GREAT PLACENTA WHICH PERMEATES ALL, FUNCTIONING AS AN AMNIOTIC MEDIUM.

THE TRICHOTOMY IS ACTUALLY CONSTITUTED BY THE HYLIC/SOMATIC, THE NOETIC, AND THE PNEUMATIC/ANIMIC.

THE PSYKHIC IS WHAT PERTAINS TO THE SOUL/PSYKHE, WHILST THE NOETICAL IS WHAT PERTAINS TO THE MIND.

>>11784848

THAT PROBLEM HAS ALREADY BEEN RESOLVED, BUT MOST INDIVIDUALS ARE NOT AWARE, NOR DO THEY COMPREHEND THE SOLUTION, WHICH HAS BEEN REVEALED SINCE JESUS' ENTERPRISE.

THERE IS SOUL, WHICH IS THE ROOT OF ENTITY; SOUL COMPRISES BODY, MIND, AND SPIRIT.

BODY, MIND, AND SPIRIT, IN MUTUAL SYNERGY, KEEP A HEALTHY SOUL; A HEALTHY SOUL KEEPS SYNERGETIC ORDER BETWEEN BODY, MIND, AND SPIRIT.

>>11768165

1. CONSCIOUSNESS WAS CREATED, NOT "AWAKENED".

2. ACCORDING TO YOU, HOW WOULD PLATON, OR ANY OTHER HUMAN, HAVE BEEN CAPABLE OF CREATING CONSCIOUSNESS?

DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT IS CONSCIOUSNESS? I DOUBT IT.

3. CONSCIOUSNESS WAS CREATED BY SOFIA, THROUGH LILITH; THIS WAS ACCOMPLISHED WHEN LILITH FUSED HERSELF WITH THE TREE OF LIFE, CAUSING A METAGENESIS IN ALL HUMANS WHO POSSESSED SOUL.

>>11736746

THE CHRISTIAN CANON SHOULD CONSIST IN THE NAG HAMMADI TEXTS, “PISTIS SOPHIA”, THE MANICHÆAN TEXTS, AND THE CATHAR TREATISES —IF YOU WANT TO READ CHRISTIAN LITERATURE, READ THOSE OPERA.

JUDEOCHRISTIANITY IS A JUDAIZED PERVERSION OF CHRISTIANITY, AND ALL THE LITERATURE THAT IS CURRENTLY CATEGORIZED AS “CANONICALLY CHRISTIAN”, IS ACTUALLY JUDEOCHRISTIAN DRIVEL.

>>11700230

IRAN, AND PERSIA, ARE NOT MUTUALLY EQUIVALENT.

IRAN IS THE ENTIRETY OF CENTRAL ASIA, FROM PAKISTAN TO THE LEVANT —ID EST: THE ZONE FORMERLY COMPREHENDED BY LESSER ARYANA.

ORIGINALLY, PERSIA WAS A CITYSTATE WITHIN ARYANA, AND SOCIOCULTURALLY DIFFERENT FROM IT.

PERSIA ORIGINATED FROM A TURANYAN INTRUSION WITHIN ARYANA, WHICH LATER GREW TO REPLACE ARYAN CULTURE IN THAT ZONE.

ORIGINALLY, THE TERM "ARYANA" REFERRED TO THE ENTIRETY OF THE ARYAN WORLDEMPIRE, BUT, AFTER THE EMPIRE'S TRIPARTITE DIVISION, ONLY THE PART RULED BY IRAJ —CENTRAL ASIA— CAME TO BE CALLED "ARYANA", TO SIGNAL ITS EXCLUSIVE LEGITIMACY AGAINST THE OTHER TWO PARTS; EVENTUALLY, THIS PART OF THE DIVIDED EMPIRE CAME TO BE KNOWN AS "IRAN", IN HONOUR OF IRAJ.

THE NAME "IRAJ" ITSELF DERIVES FROM "ARYA", FROM WHICH ALSO DERIVES THE EMPIRE'S NAME, "ARYANA".

>>11691000

1. ONE STARTS IN CHRISTIANITY WITH A NOTION OF GOD.

2. IF WHAT YOU MEAN IS "STARTING WITH CHRISTIAN LITERATURE", I ADVISE THAT YOU START WITH CHRISTIAN LITERATURE, NOT WITH JUDEOCHRISTIAN LITERATURE, THEREFORE, DO NOT READ "THE BIBLE", RATHER, READ THE NAG HAMMADI TEXTS, THEN PROCEED WITH "PISTIS SOFIA", AFTER THOSE, PROCEED WITH THE CATHAR TREATISES, AND WITH THE MANICHAEAN TEXTS.

WHY WOULD YOU WASTE TIME, AND ENERGY, IN STUDYING A SPURIOUS COMPILATION OF DISPARATE TEXTS THAT ARE PURPORTED AS "THE CHRISTIAN CANON", BUT ARE ACTUALLY ANTICHRISTIAN?

"THE (JUDEOCHRISTIAN) BIBLE" IS CRYPTOJEWISH DRIVEL; JUDEOCHRISTIANITY IS A JUDAIZED CORRUPTION OF CHRISTIANITY, THE SPIRITUAL DOCTRINE INITIATED BY JESUS, AND DEVELOPED BY HIS DISCIPLES.

YOU SHOULD INSTEAD INVEST TIME, AND ENERGY, IN READING, AND COMPREHENDING ACTUAL CHRISTIAN LITERATURE —VIDELICET: "PISTIS SOPHIA", THE NAG HAMMADI LIBRARY, THE GOSPEL OF BARNABAS, THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS, THE CATHAR TREATISES, THE MANICHAEAN TEXTS, ET CETERA.

Among all the esoteric mumbo-jumbo about Sofia and such, what is Rei actually trying to say?

http://mundusmillennialis.com/

>redpilling
So do you want a "redpill" according to your version of truth, my version of truth, or a universal truth?
Savitri Devi's Impeachment of Man, probably the primary thing that made me vegan
reading aryanism.net and mundusmillennialis.com broke me out of the /pol/-mindset of viewing Islam and/or blacks as enemy factions, though I imagine if I had just read someone like Kant the same thing would have happened. It affected me though, and that's why I bring them up. I still oppose Jews, but I also oppose tribalism in general, which is of course present to some extent within the black community as well as Islam. Don't agree 100% with either of those, but they did have profound impacts on my worldview.
Major shifts in beliefs, those above included, only seem to occur after intense "more real than reality" dreams

MUNDUS MILLENNIALIS

>>7260519
Self-control precedes intellect in importance. I could make numerous analogies but you should be able to get the point. It's about how the mind is utilized, how attention is allocated, what thoughts are maintained, the level of self-awareness in reacting to various stimuli, good and bad. A good mind quickly decays without a master to preserve, strength and direct it.