/lit/ - Literature

I took a giant, unflushable shit in the bathroom at Barnes and Noble.
It was a staff-only bathroom.

Come on Ossianfag... say the line...

>I'm a Democratic Socialist

>>20213083
A thread to argue about Christianity and Socialism at the same time?
OP, you're a genius.

>>20085666

>two bucks new, that's awesome, what's the catch?
>ohhhh, there's no catch mwahahahaha

>>19446649
>knowledge

Yes, go to India and look for a guru.

>>19282709
Mods, ban this man just to spite him

That's right. Add to cart. Buy now. If you don't get that old book someone else will. Might as well grab his other works too, just to be on the safe side.

>>19158529
Oh we won't.

>>18997596
im making out with the enlarged image on my tv while youre rereading your post. there is absolutely nothing (0) you can do about this

this is an exclusive pre-order paperback available to amazon members only

>check in while eating breakfast
>create a bait thread about Marxism
>come back at lunch, post a few frogs, post a few "cringe"s

>>18729023
i see ive baited another lolita thread into discussing pale fire with me heheh... but thats what we get for letting the PF threads die

>>18729026
hello once again spoilertag poster. surely the threads dying is more of a sign of lits illiteracy more than anything.

so youre still ignoring that all three characters have the same birthday, the many many grey/gradus and shade connections, shade and kinbotes shared literary opinions with nabokov (which would make a "its a parody" reading very awkward), kinbotes mirrored qualities of shade, that the entire poem is about the afterlife, kinbotes long digressions about the afterlife and god, the stillicide puns... all just to support your reductive theory that the book has a very dull and devoid of beauty point which is to parody academia (which lets be honest is an easy target) instead of a beautifully interconnected piece about themes that nabakov meditates on time and time again in his works? seems to me that the clues being fruitless red herrings that are meant to prank academics is exactly what people thought before signs and symbols was solved. its more probable to me that that was the real red herring all along.

like i said, i dont agree with boyds conclusion, but you cant dismiss the evidence. i dont fully agree with this either, but its a lot more on the right track, with even more evidence
>http://www.nabokovonline.com/uploads/2/3/7/7/23779748/v3_06_roth.pdf

>>18703535
Keep a notebook on you to scribble in. A ton of my writing I do when I'm supposed to be wageslaving.

>muh stealing company time
Just try 'n' stop me.

>See beautiful girl
>Get depressed that i cant get it
>Throw boiling water on her face
>Now no one can have her

Well, Mr Carlyle, it appears your Man Theory is not so great after all.

>>18112008
Only if I get caught.

>>17998922
IRREGARDLESS

>>17991617
>he doesn't know about Faust III

>>17945014
i DO read
but when i come here, i pretend that i don't

>>17914156
You're naughty anon.

Hegel-Schopenhauer.