/lit/ - Literature

wtf I like Harry Potter now

one of us, one of us, one of us, one of us

>>21404782
>If brahman has no spatial relationships it has no extension either.
Incorrect, this is a silly non-sequitur response that involves no logical connection between the first and second half of the sentence.

"Relationships" and "Extension" are two completely different things and are not dependent upon the other. A relation presupposes a multiplicity of at least two things. However, if something is the only thing that exists and is also infinite, then it has no spatial relationship with anything else because there is not an existing multiplicity that can be related in the first place, but that has nothing to do with the separate question of whether or not that thing that exists is infinite. If said thing is infinite then it still has extension even though it is not related to anything else (there being nothing else existing for it to be related to)

You first tried to assert something that was blatantly false (that Advaita says that anything with extension is unreal) and then when you were confronted with the truth, you tried to save face with a complete non-sequitur, all to cope about Nagarjuna being refuted by Richard Robinson and your own inability to rescue his arguments from being falsified. Sad!