/lit/ - Literature

>>13048665
I am confused when I see this image because they are agreeing with each other. Daffy says intrinsic value doesn't exist, and Mickey says you can't prove knowledge (and by extension, that the knowledge therefore has no intrinsic value). They are both being hypocritical, for Mickey trusts in his knowledge that knowledge doesn't hold intrinsic value, and so does Daffy. The "Will you fight? Or will you perish like a dog?" is a lazy addition (for if you admit life has no intrinsic meaning, what use is fighting for life?), and the admversion to death, "perish like a dog" is the lazy summarization on why you should live by Mickey, for if you die then you will be "like a dog", even though to live means to die. Any person who compares the mindset of those they disagree with to a dog is an idiot who hasn't thought of a genuine reason to advert to something so uses the "dog" argument to mask their resentment (i.e. the egoist is like an abandoned dog, cynic derives from an ancient greek word meaning "dog-like", the worker is like an obediant dog etc.).

>>11694102
I prefer my cartoon drawing, actually.

>>11681156

>>8432984
>implying

>>8432968
I had a dream that I met him but he was just some dark and shrouded figure who had no face.