/lit/ - Literature

>>14156136
>I can provide sources, but they're irrelevant because no one checks them

So you have no sources

>Why do you retards think wages and productivity are separated?

He’s referring to purchasing power

>I can open my books on American economic history right now and provide data.

Yet you haven’t

>Don't bullshit me by saying that the labour movement had no influence and numbers

Bad reframing. Before you were saying unions were the sole reason for the change. Now you’re arguing that to some extent it may have had influence

>I showed you data in my previous post. Unions had a huge impact in increasing wages, so much so that real wage growth surpassed productivity growth.

Gish Gallup. Reread his post