/lit/ - Literature

>>4027954

Spoken like a true member of the rabble. What a waste of breath. This man clearly has no idea what nobility is and why one ought to stand apart from every crowd, no matter how it is constituted.

Here is another dunce who has read a few lines of Marx and believed himself to stand at an elevation. In reality, this is nothing but the old routine of trying to redeem the overwhelming vulgarity and depravity of man, and slander the individual who dares to denounce it.

Modern trash. It will find its due place in time, like so much else. Meanwhile the men he directs his little tirades against are preserved, and will remain so for all eternity.

>>3952555

>The Absolute, confound it, this MUST exist, otherwise there would be nothing at all!

>But where does it come from?

>Silly question! Haven't I already said it was The Absolute?

>>3832513

Freshwater, you say?

I have a dram right here:

'Therefore, the fact that, on the occasion of certain sensations occurring in my organs of sense, there arises in my head a perception of things extended in space, permanent in time, and causally operative, by no means justifies me in assuming that such things also exist in themselves, in other words, that they exist with such properties absolutely belonging to them, independent of my head and outside it. This is the correct conclusion of the Kantian philosophy.'

Not so hard to understand, is it?