/lit/ - Literature

>>12804148
Maybe not on lit, but Peterson's "pull up yer bootstraps bucko" was highly popular amongst trad nuChan until he failed the JQ

Like look at shit LOL why do people follow low test people

ITT: Pseuds and/or talentless hacks related to literature. Talk about why you don't like them. Bonus points for goofy pictures. I'll start: Jordan Peterson reeks of pretentiousness because he never has anything profound to say.

>B-bucko, y-you have to c-clean your r-room for me b-bucko. Remember, H-Hitler took 8 s-showers a d-day

>Mother made some pancakes for Billy, but the dragon ate them all! Mother made some more, but the dragon ate those too. Mother kept making pancakes until she ran out of batter. Billy only got one of them but he said that’s all he really wanted anyway. So I’ll tell you another story about that. So, when I lived in Boston, I had little kids and my wife took care of some neighborhood little kids because she didn’t have a green card and that was she was home with the kids anyways, and anyway, she took care of some other little kids. One of them would only eat hot dogs that was quite funny. He’d only eat hot dogs at his mother’s place but at our house he ate all of his lunch and he was perfectly happy about it, so I thought that was quite amusing too. But anyways one day a neighbor came by and the neighbor had a four year old child and the neighbor was looking for someone to take care of the child because her nanny had been in a car accident and couldn’t take care of the child temporarily. So the child had sort of been circulating around neighborhood houses for a couple of days and you know people were taking care of him and then he ended up at our house. Which was fine. And so he’s a cute little guy and his — the mother came to the door and she said she’s pushed the boy in he was kind of like this [sulking], he wasn’t very happy and she said, “He probably won’t eat all day but that’s okay.” And I thought hmm that’s a remarkably interesting statement to you know, to put forth as a proposition the first time we meet your son. It’s like, he won’t eat, all day, which by the way is not okay, it’s not okay, and you’re going to tell us that it’s okay and you’re going to expect that we’re just going to accept the fact that you think it’s okay. And that’s the whole story, you deliver all that information in one little sentence. So I thought, well that’s pretty damn peculiar. I believe she was the psychologist too, which was quite interesting [sniffs]. So okay. So that’s fine. So I went out to do something and there was four kids playing in the house and when I came back the little guy was in the porch like where the boots were and everything and he was sort of standing there like this [sulking] and I thought hmm that’s not good because there’s all these other kids like he should have been in there playing eh? That obviously that’s what a child is primed to do! He should have been in there, messing about with I think there was a two year-old and a three year-old and another four year-old. He should have been in there you know causing trouble and having fun and playing but he wasn’t, and he was standing on the porch like this [sulking] and he wasn’t happy. He wasn’t happy. So I looked at him for a bit and then I poked him a couple of times because I thought, you know, if you’re interacting with little kids they’re very playful eh?

>>10615035
>mfw edgy teenagers from /lit/ are attracted to peterson because they are rebelling against the moment, they havent read enough about what peterson talks about, and they haven't been around long enough to really understand what's wrong with the world

https://www.ft.com/content/40c05b84-f7a7-11e7-a4c9-bbdefa4f210b

>On planet Peterson, the social revolutions of the 20th century have not lifted us above atavistic power games and brought about female emancipation but have led to universal degeneracy and the enfeeblement of men. Where “the traditional household division of labour has been demolished”, the result is “chaos, conflict and indeterminacy”.

>Peterson has a knack for penning sentences that sound like deep wisdom at first glance but vanish into puffs of pseudo-profundity if you give them more than a second’s thought. Consider these: “Our eyes are always pointing at things we are interested in approaching, or investigating, or looking at, or having”; “In Paradise, everyone speaks the truth. That is what makes it Paradise.” It is no defence to say there are truths here clumsily expressed: rule 10 is “Be precise in your speech”.

>This is not the only time Peterson breaks his own rules. He sounds charming when advocating the principle of charity: “Assume that the person you are listening to might know something you don’t.” In practice, he often dismisses people with opposing views with barely concealed contempt. This is particularly noticeable when he talks about religion. Peterson, a Christian, doesn’t just say atheists are wrong, but that they are wrong to even think they are atheists. Those who think otherwise “don’t understand anything. You didn’t even know that you were blind.”

>No one trying to understand how to live should read this book. Anyone interested in the growing assault on liberal values, however, should study it with fear and trembling.

>>10404058
>>10404066
Peterson is just trying to make money by being an intellectual. He doesn't actually believe what he says. WHat more proof do you need other then seeing him weasel out of admitting that the reason he cancelled the invitation to Faith Goldy wasn't because of some esoteric question of her character because she didn't question and prod the podcast she appeared on AS A GUEST instead of just admitting its because she was positive towards an anti Jewish group in the dailystormer/kypto report?

Peterson has to please Yids and pretend his a hero for standing up to college trannies and feminists. Funny because I watched all his videos at the start of the year and he mentioned a nightmare some kid in his family had of all these small bird monsters attacking him and they kept regenerating from the smoke a dragon was breathing and Peterson explained to him that he should fight the actual dragon instead of the minions the dragon was creating, thus defeating the source of the problem.

Who's creating the feminists and tranny sjw's, Jordan? Who'd the big nosed, gold hoarding monster controlling the media and edjewcation system? Spineless cuck will never compremise where his shekels come from.