/lit/ - Literature

>>20869688
>says women are beautiful
>posts a man

>>20627624
why not just cook the eggs are eat them? why drink them like a neanderthal faggot?

>>20433260
Nigger.

>>20110428
You will never be a real author. Give up, dude.

>>20025191
Great, now show me where he said abolish rent, faggot.

>>20019113
>So you can't seem to answer where I am doing what you're claiming I'm doing.
As I say, it is implied within your argument, faggot, but here, show me how "There is no objective morality" being an objective statement leads to a contradiction, because it does not follow. If you refuse to do this, there can be no arguing with you.

> how do you know objective truth exists
I gave you an example of an objective truth ("1+1=2" in Arithmetic) and mentioned a proof of objective truth:
> Assume that "there are no objective truths"
> but this is an objective truth claim and therefore self-contradictory if it is true
> ergo it must be false, ergo there must be objective truths Q.E.D.
What else do you want? Also, notice how none of this requires believing that moral truths exist.

> which you haven't done but are only assuming it does exist
As I said, the proof, however simple it is, is unnecessary because it is self-evident and the basis of the most basic of philosophical inquiry. Why would that be put into question before moral truths?

> you're refusing to presuppose objective morality exists but then at the same time assert that objective truth exists with no further demonstration, which itself is a presupposition
I'm not doing anything. I'm not a moral relativist, I'm just criticizing your retarded logic because it makes zero sense. Why do you need to prove that objective truth exists to maintain that no objective morality exists; objective truth does not necessarily entail objective morality, so saying that objective morality doesn't exist doesn't imply that objective truth doesn't exist, it just means that objective morality doesn't exist and says nothing about objective truth (other than, there are no moral statements in the set of objective truths). Again, for your argument to make sense, the existence of objective truths HAS to imply the existence of moral truths (ridiculous).

>>20018835
What a gay line. Only a faggot would write that.

>>19978663
>tfw draft age American male

>>19962661
>durr im retard
>hmm actually I am an intelligent man
>hurr durr jk I retard again
>okay I die now
wow what a book!

>>19873423
That's literally how women wake up though?

>>19872962
How could a man as muscular, disciplined, and ostensibly masculine as The Rock have such a feminine disposition? Why does he give a shit the Toe Rogan said nigger?

>>19839565
it's literally just /lit/ core shit

>>19459384
Refute him.

>>19451024
Why are they never not Jewish? It's literally every single time.

>>19439537
>wants to create his own values
>"recommend me some philosopher so I can read his values!"

>>19326779
>Elon Musk is... LE BAD
Go back.

>anime fag OP
>thread has already devolved to cuck posting
>200 "woe is me muh life is so sad" posts incoming
why do you losers post in this shit general?

>>19288313
Then what's your problem? Quit crying, faggot.

>>19242570
>starts his fantasy book with a Nietzsche quote
yeah im thinking cringe

>>19013081
>Men ~ Order - Women ~ Chaos
JP has never said this so idk what sniff man is trying to refute here.

>>18938246
That's not how the tinder algorithm works, fatass.

>>18500857
thats just crypto-degeneracy. guys shouldn't complain about women being whores and then go out and create/validate whores by sleeping with them.

>>18429192
cringe

>17322416
lame attempt at starting a pasta