/lit/ - Literature

>>20585098
That's what I'm saying, it was a rhetorical question, faggot. Spend less time forming sentences and more actually reading them.
Preface to Phenomenology is infamous because it starts with a question about prefaces and their pointlessness in a philosophical work and then proceeding to be extremely complex and inevitably incomprehensible. And it is beautiful. If a preface or introduction was meant to be read after reading the rest of the book it wouldn't be a preface or introduction. Kant's introduction to first Critique is great because it explains many concepts (not in his sense) which you will need to understand the book. It is simple and it is effective - there's no need to read it after you complete the entire trilogy of Critiques.

>>15827648
Kys. Books printed in sans serif are literal garbage: Sans serif is the bugman's and manchild's choice of font; any man of integrity knows serif is the correct choice. Times New Roman is my forever go-to.

>>14311230
E

>>14205912

>>14192648
>being religious is a brainlet sign
Very cringe my friend

>>14176312
>it bored me to dead
Maybe it's because you struggled to read it.