/lit/ - Literature

>>21598447

>>20946227

>>20937128

>>19518756
>ion

>>19390526
>it hurts my eyes to much
>I admit my papercuck ways.
>I ordered a Kindle.

>>19283749
What possibly reason would you have for not including Plato and Aristotle in any "starting with the Greeks" list? Why would you even attempt to imply that its somehow common sense that they should be separated for god knows what reason?

>>18639333
what are you talking about? its extremely entry level knowledge thatvnational socialism is VERY heavily based on socialist thought. they aren't turning over the means of production but it is beyond any doubt an expansion and evolution of socialist thought

and lets be real here, if actually turning over the means of production is a requirement of socialist thought like retards like to insist, then socialism doesn't and will never exist

>>18555011
>Blood Meridian is constantly posted on this board as an example of difficult literature

>>18408114
>non faggy gay romance novels

>>18366654
>huurrrrrrr hoe can social animals have socially enforced rules if they no have lawyers or courts!?!??!

Are you serious? This has to be a new low for you. care to elaborate on this.. intriguing line of thought?

>>18068246
are you legitimately retarded

>>18060620
why do you always go off on some weird tangent whenever you get BTFO? do you just know you are in the wrong and have no retort, but still just HAVE to say something?

>>17486220
>As all children do when they learn to never question their until they’re ready to move pit of their house. I suppose you can graphed on the rest once exposed to the Epic of Gilgamesh

>>17114319
>The modern west still functions.
>We've been locked inside for a year and the economy has been destroyed because of a virus that only got here through globalism
>That was Islam sweety.
Islamic societies were fine until W*stern influence crept in.

>>17111294
>What strategies does he go into
>Tells you he wrote a whole book about it
He also wrote more articles, for example:
>6. Radicals Must Attack The System At The Decisive Points.
>To work effectively toward the elimination of the techno-industrial system, revolutionaries must attack the system at points at which it cannot afford to give ground. They must attack the vital organs of the system. Of course, when I use the word “attack,” I am not referring to physical attack but only to legal forms of protest and resistance.

>Some examples of vital organs of the system are:

>The electric-power industry. The system is utterly dependent on its electric-power grid.

>The communications industry. Without rapid communications, as by telephone, radio, television, e-mail, and so forth, the system could not survive.

>The computer industry. We all know that without computers the system would promptly collapse.

>The propaganda industry. The propaganda industry includes the entertainment industry, the educational system, journalism, advertising, public relations, and much of politics and of the mental-health industry. The system can’t function unless people are sufficiently docile and conforming and have the attitudes that the system needs them to have. It is the function of the propaganda industry to teach people that kind of thought and behavior.

>The biotechnology industry. The system is not yet (as far as I know) physically dependent on advanced biotechnology. Nevertheless, the system cannot afford to give way on the biotechnology issue, which is a critically important issue for the system, as I will argue in a moment.

>Again: When you attack these vital organs of the system, it is essential not to attack them in terms of the system’s own values but in terms of values inconsistent with those of the system. For example, if you attack the electric-power industry on the basis that it pollutes the environment, the system can defuse protest by developing cleaner methods of generating electricity. If worse came to worse, the system could even switch entirely to wind and solar power. This might do a great deal to reduce environmental damage, but it would not put an end to the techno-industrial system. Nor would it represent a defeat for the system’s fundamental values. To accomplish anything against the system you have to attack all electric-power generation as a matter of principle, on the ground that dependence on electricity makes people dependent on the system. This is a ground incompatible with the system’s values.

>listening to people like this is what folks are talking about when they brag about being more "educated"

>>11780784
>touch kids or i'll call you a "bugman"!

>reading fiction

>>8548598
>Yeah 'par excellence'. I don't know your sentence just sounded as something Zizek would say.

If you had to represent "motivation" or a "second chance" as a place or object, how would you do it?

>>8468143
>conforming to peer pressure
>the peers are anonymous

>complaining about having something unique to contribute compared to native speakers

>>7463448
>he thinks his ranting is substantial enough to merit countering

oh my god keep going

>>7405215
>Fantastic debate skills
>thinking we're debating you

bro you're like the millionth pleb who's come around here bitching about 'muh clarity of communication' and 'pomo make anon sad bad >:(' don't delude yourself, no one's taking you seriously.