/lit/ - Literature

>>22336933
Read Cockshott. There is no irony or deeper message to this - just read Cockshott, because he's the only one to concern himself with the computational "how" of post-capitalist economic planning.
Start with "Calculation in-Natura, from Neurath to Kantorovich", over at https://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~wpc/reports/standalonearticle.pdf
His main work is "Towards A New Socialism", which is showing its age (it was written in 1989, as a package of computerizing reforms for a stagnating USSR - it's not so applicable as a roadguide today)
He also has several new books, which I haven't read yet. The latest is supposed to be on planning in an age of climate crisis, which I'm excited to get to when I have the chance.
His work on econophysics is also quite readable for the mathematically literate. See "Classical Econophysics", which he coauthored.
For a more abstract, history-oriented overview of Soviet cybernetics, there's Slava Gerovitch's "InterNyet"
https://web.mit.edu/slava/homepage/articles/Gerovitch-InterNyet.pdf
His full book, which I haven't read yet, is "From Newspeak to Cyberspeak: A History of Soviet Cybernetics"
>>22337316
Why don't you exile yourself to a farm now so we can run you over with tanks without destroying anything of value? Save us the trouble of not dragging others into your moronic peasant scheme.
>>22337458
based mechanical materialist

>>19633852

The left have the perfect theoretical background with philosophers, economist, theorists in every field to build an entire ideology backed by theory. I'm right wing and I've read all the right wing writers but we don't have anything close. Most of our writings are mostly biographical, historical, literary, and non-theory writing. What we don't have is a real theoretical background we can point to when people ask questions about how society will function. At most we could say Gentile, Schmitt, and MacIntyre but that's really it and they don't really cover much ground like the Marxists do. Just take a look at the charts the left and the charts the right have

>>19058607

economics but make it based

Empirical Marxism chart

>>14271738
>>14272285
>>14272265
Pt 2 btw Chang is so exhilarating read everything by him before continuing chart 1 and also read mankiw’s macroeconomics and watch marginal university on youtube to have even a rudimentary understanding of economics.

ill post a few

>>11426985

>>10276299

tfw to smart

>>9972385