/lit/ - Literature

>>19569632
Very good post

>>15206324
Tolkien and Hoppe might have been friends had they met each other.

>>14945264
I love how socialists shadow box with this phantom of a concept such as "capitalism", when literally every first world country with few exceptions are borderline socialist already if not fully. Socialism used to be in contrast with the early 1900s "capitalism", the closest living representative of Capitalism there ever was, but when they essentially won with the government's further encroachment of private property and rights (note: this is a function of time, not because socialists actually did anything besides exist; governments, like tumors, tend to grow) they aren't satisfied with the conclusion their ideology has lead to. They reinvent the wheel, put more emphasis on cultural and racial aspects of socialism rather than economic, and label the product of a 100 years of their fuckry as "capitalism". Because a system where people exchange what are essentially worthless labor slips for products made by government-subsided companies and about 20 percent of earned salary goes to government agencies to be redistributed into shitty second-rate public services and into obese, negro single mothers' hands is the most capitalistic thing I ever heard of.

>>14675528
>this results in an extraordinary uniformity of thought amongst libertarians generally unattainable amongst followers of say conservatism or socialism, libertarians like to fancy themselves independent thinkers when in reality they are one uniform herd - if you've met one you've met every single one
This is your most retarded "point" that basically discredits everything you bothered to type. Right-wing libertarianism is broad as hell; there are so many Anarchos it's hard to keep track of them, and they are all pitted against each other and minarchists and objectivists who believe in some retarded nightwatchmen state. Ancaps can't even agree on what constitutes a NAP violation, how intellectual "property" should be handled, who will handle borders or national boundaries, and countless other shit.
Your only exposure to "right-wing libertarianism" is with "what's a leppo" lolbertarian party soiboys.
This entire thread is pointless though because OP is just a projecting Marxist, which is the real pseud's ideology.

>>14671405
>thinking the only alternatives to liberalism are "big tent" homo-communism and "my landlord legally owns me and fucks my ass" libertarianism
It sounds like you don't understand either position, and you got your education from /pol/ memes and not from actually reading books.
>not being a right-wing socialist
No such thing. National Socialism is only "right-wing" in contemporary eyes because it's raycis. There is literally nothing right-wing about a secular, modernist, nationalist/populist, and collectivist totalitarian state, unless you were to go off the (((modern))) definition of right-wing, which just showcases your lean into modernist faggotry and reliance with leftist historiography and understanding.