/lit/ - Literature

Communism means just Waging for some peasant Commune, usually in terrible conditions

Social democracy is thousand times better
I’m living a very comfy neet life in a based western eu country and get everything I need
Why would I want to wagekek like a peasant for some filthy commune lmao
NOTHING BEATS SOCIAL DEMOCRACY

Best thread on /lit/ now, and that speaks volumes. Keks were had all round the room, boyos.

rumour has it Houellebecq will win in 2022, the year in which his novel Submission takes place

>>18826213
See you tomorrow

>playdohnism general
the boys are back in town it seems

>>18438488
>>18438495

LMAOOOOO. Thanks for the advice and the fap material both, anon. I will be cumming to your girlfriend tonight

>>18424513
>I was so bored with life I was getting blackout drunk on most weeknights to dull the monotony.

>>18364167
beyond based FUCK that roastie

>>18245172
bueno

>>18074604
Well said.

Australian posters welcome? I feel like the top unis here have the same bant as the oxbridge shitposting in here

>y'ain't
>fo'c'sle
>bo's'n
>i'on't

Books where there's a secret society in conflict with another secret society

Jesus does not love you. He loves his elect. He did not die for you. He died for me because I was predestined to be saved and you are predestined for hell if you don't believe or if you're Catholic.

I don't care who is president or how many trannies post here because God predestined it all. Also, like most Presbyterians in extremely wealthy not because I believe in some sinful prosperity gospel but just because only intelligent professionals like myself get God.

Enjoy hell. The Bible says homos and trannies and atheists like you are vessels for God's wrath. You are not loved, but God graciously sustains you anyway until you burn in hell forever.

Repent and believe. Only the chosen will respond to this call.

>>17537906
Incredible

>>17445936
There are good arguments for god. What is happening in this thread are good arguments against him

>alliterative medieval poetry

I know that the English language has no rules but I'm struggling with this sentence.

>I am calling to say that I will send over a big guy to punch you in the balls once a day for the rest of your life until you pay me 10 Bitcoins.

>I am calling to say that I will send over a big guy to punch you in the balls once a day for the rest of your life, until you pay me 10 Bitcoins.

I think the latter (with the comma near the end) sounds better and it's what I want to use but I worry that I'm missing something.

>>17208820

>>17161855
But desu, I identity as a right-wing racist Marxist.

>>17129047
>>17129087
>>17129100
>me and the kekposters right now

>>17121262
>native speakers need to read shakespeare in simplified english while ESL chads are open to new vocab and can easily guess their meaning

This thread turned out to be super informative.

Thanks /lit/.

- Random lurker