/lit/ - Literature

>>16533147
>>16533690
Continuation of the last post

Like I said I think you're in necessarily limiting Spengler if you do that and I don't think highly of deep ecology anyway. I love industry, technics and technology (not in a Bugman way, Italian futurism is more my kinda thing) and I think identification with nature is the sign of a lack of a Faustian drive of world domination.

Through the painting of Christ as the average white guy developed the portrait and finally the self-portrait. The way I see it Mona Lisa is one of the first portraits and insofar special as it is a representation of Faustian individualism. The perspective is also important. I think the way she looks at the person looking at her painting is special. I've been in the Louvre and I've seen the Mona Lisa and frankly, it's not that great.

I'm pretty sure he spergs out about brown and not grey in Rembrandt. And he writes at least two dozen pages on Rembrandt.

>'Finally, in Rembrandt, objects dissolve into mere coloured impressions, and forms lose their specific humanness and become collocations of strokes and patches that tell as elements of a passionate depth-rhythm. Distance, so treated, comes to signify Future, for what Impressionism seizes and holds is by hypothesis a unique and never recurring instant, not a landscape in being but a fleeing moment of the history thereof.'
>>16533690
>I don't know anybody or anything related to Spengler that could help you gain immortality

This was a joke btw