/lit/ - Literature

>>11369840
BASED Schoppy was fucking BASED. See his essay 'On Women' if you want to know how redpilled he was :D

wittgenstein knew fuck all about the philosophers that came before him

>>11369850
based

>>11369862
i call him Schoppy because he is so fucking redpilled and BASED :) Normies will never get it, they're BTFO

>>11369850
>>11369862

>american posting hours
>board immediately turns to shit
>front page filled with /pol9k/ bait about american identity politics
>threads filled with < 20 word shitposts

Why has america never contributed anything worthwhile to world culture? All that has come from it is cancer.

>>11369883
careful lad, you can get arrested for that there speech

>>11369850
SEETHING

>>11369883
Anon please save me

>>11369883
>reddit spacing
>poor english
>post consists wholly of puling
Thank God for europoors

>>11369883
not based

>>11369898

>puling

lmao what a faggot word

>>11369849
This is actually his greatest strength because he was far less enraptured by the worship of earlier ideas and was able to take a step back and see the flaws in the entire basis of Western philosophy. Were he spending his mental strength to tease out what the fuck Kant was trying to say in every sentence he would have been lost like the rest.

>>11369840
Ludwig “I didn’t read Plato until I was 50” Wittgenstein sure does have some spicy hot takes.

>>11369943
Yet he had a far greater understanding of philosophy than any autodidact, chronological reader piece of shit on this board

>>11369960
his Investigations is basically him admitting he knew fuckall and having a breakdown on paper

>>11369986
>his Investigations is basically him admitting he knew fuckall
but this is true of all philosophy, that's the insight therein

>>11369840
>>11369849
>>11369850
>>11369862
>>11369882
>>11369883
>>11369888
>>11369890
>>11369895
>>11369898
>>11369900
>>11369910
>>11369941
>>11369943
>>11369960
>>11369986
>>11370054
Shut the fuck up.

>>11370152
No

>>11369960
>Yet he had a far greater understanding of philosophy than any autodidact
probably because he was mentored by Frege and Russell

>>11369840
>stop communicating through language! It doesn't work, totally useless lol
>Hey! I said STOP IT!
>stop paying attention to Schopenhauer!, he didn't get that it's totally pointless, hey where are you guys going?!?!

>>11370319
Yeah it was a pretty amusing statement. Guy mentored by two of the most important philosophers of the time at one of the most lauded institutes of higher learning turned out to be more insightful that random liberal arts kids. Who would have guessed!

>>11369882
based

>>11369850
Based>>11369862
>>11369882
>>11370152
>>11370704
B
A
S
E
D

>>11370720
Based basedposter

>>11370704
*snap*
>>11370720
*snap*
>>11370953
*snap*

>>11370720
Based
>>11370959
Cringe

>>11369840
from what I get, Wittgenstein was like based Ted in terms of raw intelligence and logic, but rather than being a based wildman steppenwolf he decided he would rather be a faggot

based

>>11369840
For those in the know, with access to substances and technology not widely available, people can communicate without words and Wittgenstein probably knew it. For it had been discovered before his time.
So his statement, although equally correct and practically useless, is also in it`s essence, elitist and belonging to that scientific movement i can`t currently remember the name of, popular between the 19th and 20th century, advocating for non-transparent science and government.

>>11369840
>2018
>potentially interesting discussion
>autists shriek "ironically"
I'm sure S. and W. would be so proud of you intellectual, worthwhile beings

>>11371049
This. Not a single good post in this thread.

>>11371063
based
>>11371049
*snap*
>>11371036
based
>>11370969
>Cringe
*snap*
>>11370959
based
>>11370953
*snap*
>>11370720
*snap*

>>11371038
Technocracy?

>>11369840
>Beat a child almost to death
>Pretend to volunteer, just live off rich families money not working
>Socially signal at every possible moment
>Write a homo shopping list that gets praised by kikes and loser cucks saying nothing

What a insufferable faggot

Best thread on /lit/ right now

>>11369883
The chinks will take over soon.

he went deep and stopped at the edge of the abyss

“6.4311
Death is not an event of life. Death is not lived through.
If by eternity is understood not endless temporal duration but timelessness, then he lives eternally who lives in the present.
Our life is endless in the way that our visual field is without limit.”

What the fuck did he mean by this? In what way is our visual field endless?

>>11369840
Ah?
I thought He loved Schopenhauer's philosophy. what is going on
What's the context of this? Who is right?

>>11372085
>Our life is endless IN THE WAY that our visual field is without limit.
we can't perceive the limits of our visual field

>>11372111
Wittgenstein is right. Schopenhauer is immature.

>>11370970
imagine thinking like this.

>>11369850
I totally agree with you, misogynists and racists is not welcome, here are some ideas on how we can stop them:
Ban r9k and pol to get rid of nazis and women haters.
Ban anyone who identifies as or uses the word "incel"
Implement upvotes(so that the popular threads are on top instead of the controversial).

>>11369850
fucking BASED.

"Wittgenstein? More like always already Dimwittgenstein."
- Derrida, 2019

>[Wittgenstein] does not combat, still less reject, Schopenhauer's epistemological account of the world as representation, but goes what he regards as an entire level deeper, and gives an account of it in terms of logic, which he sees as prior, indeed primal. His criticism of Schopenhauer's doctrine would therefore be not that it is wrong but that it is too shallow.

>On the other hand, Wittgenstein was quite nonreferential, specially when compared to Schopenhauer who would always trace back the origin of ideas and give due credit to past thinkers. Schopenhauer had a huge influence on Wittgenstein, at the very least in his so called "early thought", yet you don't see many aknowledgements to Schopenhauer for this, even when he is clearly working through, agreeing or disagreeing with some idea he took from him.

https://www.quora.com/Schopenhauer-has-got-quite-a-crude-mind-Where-real-depth-begins-his-ends-What-did-Wittgenstein-mean-by-this

Yeah sorry lit, Quora really beat you on this one.

Recently found out Wittgenstein was a patron to Trakl. ¿Anyone got any further info on it? As in any documentation of their relationship outside what's already readily available.

>>11372690
Pretty good.

>>11372715
Too good for /lit/, even when ironically shallow itself.

So Wittgenstein didn't think Schopenhauer was wrong. He was right but superficial. Hence the need to go more in depth. Is that correct?

>>11372930
Wittgenstein was a homosexual and Schopenhauer was not

the virgin schopenhauer, the chad hegel etc. etc.

>>11369850
BASED roasties btfo

>>11369850
he was the first and the last real gangweeder

>>11371226
quality post anon,keep going