/lit/ - Literature

http://prhln.tumblr.com

If you have tumblr, and like it, I would appreciate you following it!

I am a creature of contradictions and these contradictions lead me to post secret blogs to public imageboards.

Also: I'm reading Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow. I normally read at 800wpm, but after maybe an hour of sustained reading, I've only gone past 33 pages. This isn't normal!

OP is a cool dude

OP, I really like the way you write. Needs more cock. You sounds sexy. Gayfag: OUT.

>>1141904
OP here.

>implying I don't intend to post cock at some point in the future.
>...actually, not too sure.

Wow. I like this.

Holy fucking shit.

You can seduce me any time.

*followed*

>>1141920
Thank you. I appreciate you.

>hidden floozy
Hmm.

I don't like your statement about women only being good for three things. Not following. And fuck you.

>>1141945
I'm sure if you read the rest of the blog my genuine love for women is apparent. Criticism acknowledged, though.

>>1141945
>implying girls *aren't* only useful for three things
Back to the kitchen, whore.

Share the pictures of Marla?

>>1141957
Maybe on the blog in the future (See: follow!). I'm big on consent playing a role when it comes to me writing about them.

That said I can tell you that if you went to RS and searched, you'd find a fair few awesome things.

I liked it, especially the whole "reinventing/rediscovering myself" motif. Please change the color scheme, though - white text on a black background is murder on the eyes.

>>1141947
I skimmed the most of it. It was decent, just not my cup of tea. I don't really have interest in camwhores. I personally don't need to boost my sense of self-worth by displaying myself on the internet. I am fully aware of all the sexism that comes with being a woman on the web, most specifically on 4chan. Most of the time I never disclose my gender, but in my last post, it could have easily been inferred.

I enjoyed the posts that didn't really have to do with women. Your bit about how depression should not to be treated with chemicals is noteworthy. However, temporary depression that comes with something slightly traumatic, such as a breakup, is much less severe than the type of depression people have suffered from for years. Yet I agree with you there, saying the pain should be felt. No need to go to a doctor and get happy pills because someone broke up with you.

>>1141975
Fuck me in the ass.

>>1141978
OMG HOW DID YOU KNOW MY TRIP.

Seriously. How did you? That was well-done.

(I'm not averse to a good pegging, though.)

As blogs go, this is pretty A+ stuff. No tumblr so can't follow, but I'll drop in once in a while as long as I remember.

I just read the entire thing and I love it. Love it.

>>1141893
I read almost everything. It was good.

>>1141978
No thanks.

>>1142000
That wasn't him

Write about me OP.

Email in the link. I'm submissive and looking for a dom and I have a plethora of issues you can glean from me :3

>>1141893
You have a really unique voice. You're tasteful when you write about sex. You carry yourself with a lot of confidence.

Reading this makes me wish I was a Rachael.

>>1142010
Reading this makes me realize that Rachael might be reading this.

>Feels mostly ambivalent but somewhat curious, man.

Followed. Great fucking stuff, man.

This gave me a lot of enjoyment.

OP, I think you wrote about my 18yo sister...

In the post about th girls who have taken photos for you, is the girl in the pic Olivia?

I think it's fucking obnoxious to use Rachael's artwork if she's stopped speaking to you.

Your writing style is excellent, followed.

Holy samefag, batman!

>>1142172
>>1142172
>Rachael herself perhaps?

I can see why this appeals to some people. Good job on appealing to some people, OP.

I think your really putting a positive spin on living life as an unremitting sex addict. I dislike you as a person from your writing but at least your contributing to society.

>>1141893
Your psychoses intrigue me. And I added you to StumbleUpon, like it or not.

I honestly believe you're holding yourself back by not being more descriptive about yourself. We know you're the star of the show for a reason. You're fucking bleeding with charm. If I wanted to feel invested in this blog I'd like to know more about you, the real you and not just your feelings.

Other than that all I want to ask is if you're a published author?

reading this has just made me realize nobody's written like an internet-age don quixote. play your cards right and you could be that.

7.5/10

pretty good. doesn't have as much appeal to a female reader though; it just seems like you seduce a lot of weird chicks and it skews the accuracy of your assumptions on women.

>>1142284
Is anybody ever really 'normal', though? (I'm curious at how to appeal to you and your female readership, assuming you are; the bulk of the current readership *is* female, but I don't presume any of them represent the whole gender. I'm listening to what you've got to say, though)

>>1142268
Too high praise. Cannot accept.

>>1142230
Fictionwise I've had published short stories, yeah. I don't have the sustained force of will to write a novel-length.

>>1142224
Thanks! I hope others stumble upon it, then.

>>1142223
Best compliment I've received. I don't know whether to thank you or spank you.

>>1142291
well, it's not that it isn't interesting; i'm still following it. but it makes you less relatable/likeable when all your lady friends have daddy issues.
i guess your resources are limited though, since it's harder to meet/seduce nice girls on the internet.

perhaps you should try anyway though, s'always nice to have a challenge

>>1142301
oh whoops; also:
no one is really normal, but it's nice to have variety in the type of fucked-up-ness.

>>1142301
Thank you for that excellent suggestion. I'll have it noted, and I think it'd make a good contrast from the usual litany of fetishes and fuckedupness. I know a few legitimate nice girls.

>>1142311
i look forward to reading about it

>>1142291

I see you're receptive to being roughed up a little bit, how about another?

I think that another part of your work that could be considered weak is that it could be easily dismissed as yet another man's laundry list of sexual conquests dressed up to be more than it is. Like an eagerly artistic "Average American Male.'

I've come across this type of thing before, and I've seen it be successful with wild imagery. That 'semen stains the mountaintop' kind of thing.

Poetic imagery allows the reader to be more 'forgiving' of behavior society deems as transgressive and counterproductive. I think that that kind of thing will win women to your cause and they will be more accepting of the things you've 'done', maybe even relate.

I hope this helps.

Now, OP, I can read that you really love women, but what have women ever done for you to deserve this sort of treatment?

At times it feels like a memorial for all these women you've chatted up.

Mrrrr some good stuff here coming from a chick. added you on AIM too :3

Probably not the best to leave your RL AIM on your not-RL blog, cutiepie.

>>1142315
That is the exact way I imagined this blog.

I imagined virtua-Bond kissing up virtua-Fields.

Then Fields dies epically.

brrr. you wrote about me. i know you told me already but WHAT a way to find out.

kinda got a little wet for you reading it, a. always wanted to be written about. <3

you're definitely the second-hottest malaysian sex blogger in malaysia. right after najib tun razak.

>More teenagers who think they're deep and intelligent.

Fuck this board.

>>1144301
People here get party v& for that. :(

How did you know I was from there..?

Sage because I know who you are and you've ruined my perception of you, goddammit, A

>>1144370

Step 1.
>>Probably not the best to leave your RL AIM on your not-RL blog, cutiepie.

Step 2.
google "ciaran doherty" + parhelion

Step 3.
http://www.darkprovidence.com/wiki/User:Parhelion

>>1144301
If the honorable prime minister of that country wrote a sex blog I would read it. I mean fuck the dude is ugly as balls.

do you honestly expect us to read this shit and take it seriously? as far as i can tell, you're just a loser who has had cybersex with a dozen women. or did you actually think we'd be impressed with your writing?

Look, with all due respect... I like to think of myself as a pretty sex-positive sort of person -- the kind of "cool cat" who's "hip to the jive" about "gettin' jiggy with with it," as you kids might say -- so I want to like this, I really do. But frankly I think your blog is poorly written and morally retarded. Don't quit your day job, whatever that might be.

>>1144442

His day job---as a little quick googling revealed---is keeping ANOTHER blog. And being a "Writer of words, texts, and communication. Journalist. Gamer. Designer. Thinker & more..."

http://amirulruslan.com/index.html

Seriously moot in his infinite wisdom did not invent /lit/ for 20yo posers to post their wank-bank fantasies and cybersex transcripts.