/lit/ - Literature

>>11693442
nihilism.

Leftism.

>>11693442
common sense? men don't get pregnant, fucking a random thot has no impact on her

the reason a woman cheating is so deeply immoral is because it is potentially cucking the guy, which evolutionarily is one of the absolute worst things that can happen to him

>>11693442
Egoism.

>>11693442
If she doesn't find out: utilitarianism.

if it was with her consent it wouldn't be cheating

Hedonism

Women don't have morals

Its clear you've already decided what you're going to do. You've already justified it to yourself so why would you need a philosophy to justify it? Probably because you're a pussy and you're afraid of admitting your a piece of shit (by your own definition, because if you didnt think you were doing something morally wrong, you wouldn't be searching for a moral justification)

>>11693844
>t. thot

>>11693442
womanism

1. Source
2. If your girlfriend is a christian she goes to heaven every time she orgasms

>>11693442
The Symposium.

>>11693858
Hey look i never told him not to cheat on her and i never gave my opinion on the morality of it, i was just making fun of his dumbass question. I think he should cheat because thats what he wants to do and its not physically harming anyone.

>>11693452
This. He new sexual revolution dictates you can cuck her. Cream in her best friend's tunabox, and watch he suck it out of her. Be careful though, you'll have to suck her bull's cock clean after he decimates her trouthole

>>11693442
Satanism:
Do as thou wilt.

>>11693442
Egoism, Master Morality a la Nietzsche, Deleuze's idiot philosophy, Process Philosophy, Hedonism, Skepticism, Epicureanism, Traditionalist Political Philosophy etc etc etc
>>11693826
They're physically incapable of formulating moral systems because all morality is designed to control violence (which women aren't involved in) and sex (which women want specifically out of control and unregulated beyond just being allowed to enslave as many betas as possible)

Notice how she's not thinking about anything at all and looks like an animal more than a human?

>>11694113
>which women aren't involved in)
you havent met enough women lmao

Women do have a moral system it is just based on 'what is good for me and my kids and other women and things attached to me'. theyre basically all natural Stirnerites

men's moral system is a lot more complex, and has to do with ways of behavior that advance them and their group, just like women, but it isn't fundamentalyl tied to conceptions of themselves in every regard, it is constructed in terms of various 'ideals' men make to encompass the whole thing.

I think this is because in our evolutionary history women have always been passive due to male physical dominance, whereas men have had opportuinites to conduct the entire group. We all have kings in our genetic legacy, as well as a shitload of commoners with no power except usually against their wife and children.

It's a fundamentally different way of being. the modern situation is extremely bizarre and contrary to how we evolved, which is probably why both sexes seem to be so miserable and dysfunctional

it has its advantages though, for example we can all fuck as many young hot people as we like for as long as we like, given our innate qualtiies, and the effort we put in. Which is a shitload of fun

>it's another 'virgins who can't get laid talk about how much they hate women' episode

>>11693442
Of course there is, there's nothing stopping you from cheating on your girlfriend and you don't need a philosophy to affirm your freedom to do so. What is to be considered is if YOU can allow yourself to cheat on your girlfriend without her consent, if so then you shouldn't need to ask if any philosophy can justify it. You must consider what your own conscience tells you is right and act in harmony with your instinct as that is what makes a free man.

>>11693458
From a woman's perspective why should she care if a man gets cucked if you accept that from a man's perspective he shouldn't care about her feelings?

>but it's not feelings it's evolution!
No it's not. Evolution is survival of the fittest and in that case it makes sense for a woman to mate with whoever she deems worthy. The reason this is objectionable to most is because that's a deeply antisocial way of thinking because it shows no respect for one's partner,as does adultery committed by men. In that way we can't hold one to be permissible and another to not be.

>>11694113
>Master Morality a la Nietzsche
Nietzsche doesn't endorse master morality, he explicitly denounces any kind of morality.

>>11693442
Machiavellianism

>>11694199
it's not at all comparable, it does hurt women emotionally but it doesnt fuck up their reproductive strategy, which let me remind you is the entire reason we exist, in the same way at all

ive had girlfriends who understood i was going to fuck other girls and they just sort of accepted it because they knew i loved them and didnt love the random girls. that is normal for them, they dont really mind sharing guys, some women even go into harem situations like what the Muslims or Africans do, or just impromptu harems like in modern dating scenes.

a man that accepts his woman will cheat on him though is deeply fucked up, and the relationship will not last, she will leave him for one of the guys she cheats on him with

as far as actually cucking guys, i understand women have the impulse to do so, so i dont see it as entirely wrong. maybe if like 3 of the children are the husbands and 1 is a different guy's then that is ok. It's a fair exchange maybe, he gets access to reproduction, and she gets to try her different strategies of evolutionary success. A kind of compromise i suppose. But he should be allowed to impregnate random women in that case as well, but child support fucsk that up, unless its done discretely with women who also have husbands who cna provide for them.

the other problem is that not all men are created equally, so a lot of them will just be cucked and cant impregnate other women.

this is just the natural state of things i guess, so whatever, it is fine

>>11694136
>you havent met enough women lmao
yes i have and i've been in relationships with them for years. Please don't talk to me like you know who I am or what I have experienced, its very rude and makes me want to crush your trachea.
>Women do have a moral system it is just based on 'what is good for me and my kids and other women and things attached to me'. theyre basically all natural Stirnerites
That's in-group bias not stirner's philosophy, maybe you should read Stirner (again)

everything else you said is fucking stupid, you annoying arrogant midwit pseud
>>11694208
No, Nietzsche explicitly endorses master morality. Kaufmann was a mewling, nebbish little insect that was threatened by this. N over and over and over endorses bravery, excess, divine stupidity, aristocratic bearing and adiaphoria, the instinct to appropriate, cruelty for its own sake, lavish living and luxuriation, warfare and adventure. His entire philosophy is Timocratic Dionysianism for Artists, Philosophers and Statesman. Reread Will to Power and Genealogy of Morals, ignore Kaufmann he doesn't know what the fuck he's saying and is Jewish and afraid of being squished like the arthropod he and his race really are.
>>11693934
t. giga whore

it actually is harming her physically as betrayal is strongly associated with negative mental health outcomes, which is actual damage done to the frontal lobe aka depression and low serotonin tone; combined with possible transmission of STI's and finally raising her cortisol as she agonizes over the mistake of trusting this sociopath. You stupid fucking whore (male or female)

>>11694229
>it's not at all comparable, it does hurt women emotionally but it doesnt fuck up their reproductive strategy, which let me remind you is the entire reason we exist, in the same way at all
And why does that matter? His life and his continued genetic proliferation is utterly meaningless in any objective capacity to the universe and to other people. You haven't demonstrated why anyone should give a fuck about another person's "reproductive strategy" be they male or female.

/lit/ should already know that you can't derive an ought from an is but I think mentioning that would be to give this paper-thin argument too much credit since you haven't even demonstrated that it actually is an is.

>>11694252
it is absolutely stirnerism it's total solipsism, their caring about the 'group' is only in terms of how the category of women being treated affects them

i question how much you know about women if you dont know that

also by all means crush my trachea, let's do it

>>11694256
well of course morality is bullshit, i thought we all knew that

what im saying is that it impacts a man much more psychologically and emotionally for his women to cheat on him than vice versa. It is simply different, and i assumed whatever meme morality you have would assign greater immorality to actions which cause more pain

but yes obviously it's just nonsense