/lit/ - Literature

im based

im based

fuck yeah im based

based based based

oh yeah

based pissssss based

hell yeah fucking based

oh yeah fucking pissssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssssSSSSSSSSSSSsssssssssss

Like a number one Amazon best seller for worthless Jungian psychobabble, covert Nazi apologism, and YouTube tergiversating of Clintonian proportions.

>>11767205
Difficult to respect this guy since he goes against basically all of his own arguments when it comes to "white supremacy".

>>11767209
based!

based

>>11767209
fpbp - we can all go home now

>>11767209
based and pisspilled

>>11767205
WELL IT DEPENDS WHAT YOU MEAN POST-MODERN, NEO-MARXIST, TRIAL, EXECUTION, TABLE BY CORRUPTING, YOUTH, WHITE, MEN, BELIEVING, GODS, CITY, DIVERSITY, EQUITY, INCLUSION, APOLOGY, JORDAN, PETERSON, LOOK, LIKE

>>11767244
based

Can we kill everyone in this thread? please

>>11767291
Well it depends what you mean by kill

>>11767295
And that is NOT a road you want to bloody well go down!

>tfw can't decide whether he's the most intelligent man in existence or the most intelligent man who has ever existed

>>11767314
Both desu

>>11767237
How so? From what little I've seen he's spoken out about that, saying any collectivism is bad.

>>11767469
He likes religion and hierarchy which are collectives.

How do we debug this timeline?

>>11767209
Imagine having a set of belief-entities that would make you do that. Should I now gloat in my privilege of not having those? But that by itself would take me closer. Arrogance of your kind is so despicable I want to move further.

He doesn't need to defend himself, all respectable intellectuals, the ones you don't find on Buzzfeed news or Youtube understand and appreciate his work.

>>11767771
Like Nathan J. Robinson?

I like the guy but I despise his pseud audience.

>>11767726
>He likes religion
He likes narratives and how certain stories seem to reappear over and over with slightly different shades in religions all across time, culture and continents. This doesn't include the fact that all religions are collectivist, particularly religions that force you to reflect internally to look for peace. And don't say that multiple people believing one thing is inherently collectivist
>and hierarchy
Explain how hierarchy is a form of collectivism?

Also, you completely failed to explain your allegation of him changing his tune when it comes to white supremacy.
That is not an allegation you can just mention nonchalantly and breeze on as though you never said it.

>>11767828

Not him, but he's willing to discuss the average IQ of the Azhkenazi but won't touch the 15 point Black-White IQ gap with a ten-foot pole.

Say what you will about the credibility of the 15 point gap, or if you beg to differ about the exact numerical distance, he won't even acknowledge it.

>>11767858

*but Jordan Peterson's willing...

>>11767279
He's right tho

he'd probably just respond with
> yes, but is it really?
to every question(even those not directed at him) during the trial

>>11767858
Yeah, I absolutely agree. He'd 100% lose his job for that. University isn't where you go for high learning, research and truth. Those are normally the 3 qualities of weaponised autism on the deep web

>>11767205
>The premise of this thread.

>>11767762
You haven’t escaped gloating buddy boy. It’s never a good look, let fools’ behavior speak for itself

>>11767244
>If truth is subjective, can't I just tune these people out and ignore their opinions for the rest of my life? The clear answer is "Yes". Fuck them!
Holy shit! Is he an ubermensch?

>>11767802
Yes or Ben Shapiro

Did he also fuck slave boys?

Correlationism is a disease. ABC = 666

>>11767205
What Apology? Dude is making mad money off retards

>>11767209
Seek mental help, anon.

>>11767217
>covert Nazi apologism

Good meme

>>11767217
>cover Nazi apologism
Tumblr and MSM is a real good nonbiased way of getting information

>>11768369
>>11768303
https://youtu.be/b8AcmzqFdPM

who /based/ here?

>>11767205
Lmfao quality post.
I guess the issue is that Peterson lacks an obliterating irony. Read the concept of irony by Kierkegaard for More info on this

>>11767205
>>the postmodern neomarxists put him on trial, with execution on the table
>>the charges: corrupting the youth (white men), and not believing in the gods of the city (diversity, equity, and inclusion).
if those were the charges then a postmodern neomarxists defense would be the best one
moral corruption is relative

>>11767205
Two words
THUG LIFE

>>11768740
Well it depends on what you mean by corruption and what you mean by relativism.

>>11767205
My favorite JP fact:
When he spoke out against the neomarxist plot to add gender identity to the Human Rights Act, the Canadian senate sent their Gestapo, summoned him to their courts and demanded of him how they could change the law to his satisfaction, so that his concerns about free speech would be alleviated.

Truly a chilling display of the totalitatianism and leftist fascism to come. He had nothing to say about how to improve the bill btw.

>>11767209
metamodernism is shit

>>11767205
Based post

The real question is what would the Apology of OP look like if he was put on trial for sucking too many dicks lmao

>>11769661
"I'm Guilty"
-OP

>>11767244
KEK WTF MODERN DAY NEITZSHE is this a meme i dont get. I laughed to much wtf. BASED , anyone who disagrees is a S O I B O Y.


I've never actually read up on the guy( Peterson ) has he contributed anything of significance to philosophy? All I've heard is him tell people to clean their rooms and such.

>>11767205
Someone explain, Postmodernism is it like i understand its a departure from modernism but is it like traditionalism.

is based contra /lit/-approved?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LqZdkkBDas

>>11767205
>the charges: corrupting the youth (white men)

You have it backwards, it's the postmodern neomarxists corrupting the good Evangelist flyover drones and making them degenerate traps and furries or (God forbid) actually literate.

Peterson is a nobody riding his youtube 15 minutes for all they're worth.

>>11767205
What makes you think he would apologize at all? You know he wouldn’t and he’d be right not to. There’s nothing to apologize for.

>>11767279
Uneducated redditors crying in the replies

>>11769759
I guess it depends on which postmodernism you are asking about, postmodernism is not a single entity.

>>11769859
the way americans talk about 'flyover states' is honestly so unpleasant. Like aritocrats smugly calling peasants animals or something except you arent even fucking aristocrats

>>11767205
>be JBP
>be waiting in the gulag before sentencing
>make an appeal to the gods for a last-minute defense attorney to champion your cause
>like a trial by combat Game of Thrones-style, except only theory is allowed
>the gods hear, and a cloud of mist materializes in the room
>an eerie voice is heard
>it's fucking Foucault
>your prayers have been answered, lobster-man
>JBP goes to slash his wrists immediately
>but wait, Ghost Foucault says. let me have a crack at this first
>the next day all of the judges are arranged and prepared to condemn
>bah gawd that's Michel Foucault's music
>Foucault comes in and dismantles all of the critiques discursively, showing how all of peterson's critics are still beholden to the same disciplinary power structures foucault warned about years ago
>his apology runs for six hours and is later transcribed and becomes a masterpiece
>JBP is acquitted, roll credits

SCUUUUMMMGAAAAANNNG

>I dreamed I saw my maternal grandmother sitting by the bank of a swimming pool, which was also a river. Her genital region was exposed dimly. It had the appearance of a thick mane of hair. She was stroking herself absentmindedly. She walked over to me with a handful of pubic hair compacted into something resembling a large artist's paintbrush. She pushed this at my face. I raised my arm several times to deflect her hand. Finally, unwilling to hurt her or interfere with her any further, I let her have her way. She stroked my face with the brush gently and said, like a child, isn't it soft?

This is your self help guru

>>11771036
Based Foucault

>>11769769
No he is not.

>>11767205
Jordanus Petersonius

>>11771011
Oh please, I am sure the people in flyover states also bitch about them in their own smug way.

>>11771363
>Latin
>Sokrates

>>11771413
>acting as if you too aren't in a flyover state

>>11767205
Peterson is Meletus accusing philosophy of corrupting the youth

>>11771011
Don’t be naive. In this new world order, you are sure to find the people pulling the GLOBAL strings in NYC or Los Angeles.

Just saying. There is lots of money, but more importantly, power within the US.

Eurotards can be so dumb and naive.

>>11771431
/thread

>>11769688
>Peterson
>philosophy

>>11767209
pee is stored in the balls

>>11767871
No, he is historically incorrect. Besides, replacing religion by a cult of worship as Stalin did is hardly being an "atheist state".

Just imagine a whole Platonic dialogue, but Jordan Peterson plays the role of Socrates and is constantly complaining about how his interlocutors are taking him out of context and going off on long diatribes full of mystical jungian speak that baffle everyone listening.

>>11767244
>sycophantic lobster fanboyism
>not knowing what pomo is but it's bad
>that guy with the British Union of Fascists logo on his profile pic
Lmao this cap has it all

>>11769218
IIRC the lawyer invited alongside him to present an argument against the bill had suggested that it be explicitly written into the bill that it would not compel speech. They did not concede this amendment.

Also boring strawman.

>>11772000
Ironic that Peterson got BTFO by Socratic questioning by some Australian comedian

>>11769769
>>11771334
yes, she is

>>11772181
>she
kek ok

>>11772181
stop shilling your garbage videos you fucking weirdo