[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 686 KB, 1920x2560, anarchist cookbook.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13656929 No.13656929 [Reply] [Original]

Is this worth a read, /lit/?

>> No.13656978

>>13656929
Anecdotally, I've heard it's fucking dogshit.

>> No.13656993

>>13656929
The recipes for drugs and bombs are outdated in many cases, and the stuff about surveillance doesn’t even scratch the surface of today’s world. I can see why it was useful before the internet but now just about everything in there can be easily found online if you know where to look.

>> No.13657169

>>13656929
By and large outdated

>> No.13657187

>>13656929
Is this the one where they say you can get high by smoking banana peels??

>> No.13657204
File: 89 KB, 664x1000, DA637ED0-05A1-4E6C-8103-4F1229BC0E9F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13657204

>>13656929
Best start with this.

>> No.13657227

>>13656929
No. Most of it is wrong or made up or copypasta.

>> No.13657237

>>13657204
Butt hurt fly.

kek

>> No.13657247

>>13657237
You mean of course “« Ƹ̵̡. Ӝ̵̨̄ Ʒ. »”

>> No.13657254

>>13657204
>actual theory
OP obviously wants bomb-making information buttercunt

>> No.13657259
File: 118 KB, 318x452, 39990803._SX318_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13657259

>>13656929
Read this instead

>> No.13657264

>>13657204
Anarchism is too weak to combat climate catastrophe.

>> No.13657275

>>13657264
>We must wage war and bring all the bourgeoisie to their knees
>And it will be a glorious and green revolution!

You bonkers

>>13657254
I know. Best to start there

>> No.13657324

>>13657275
I have no idea what this is meant to mean? You're saying it's impossible for a revolution to be green? Well yeah I probably agree, which is why anarchism, an ideology that has no successful revolutions under its belt, cannot combat climate catastrophe. Assuming you could even pull off a revolution (historical evidence suggests anarchists can't) to begin with that is - you wouldn't be willing to use the necessarily '''authoritarian''' means necessary.

>> No.13657446
File: 56 KB, 500x332, 18D046CB-4203-4F3F-B17D-228876A3CCBD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13657446

>>13657324
The revolution is a social event, not a political one. It lives on. It grows like a fungus. Yes the commies come by kill them, the liberals and their fascists come by to kill them, but we’re still here, still trying.
And of fucking course they can “combat” climate change. That’s practically our number one agenda

>> No.13657491

>>13657446
The revolution can be worded however you want, it needs some basic things regardless - territory, people, power, means of self defense, and more. An actual, concrete existence. Not a patchwork of isolated 'communes'. Not words. Not ideas, even. No amount of fungus can conquer state power, it can only fester in the shadows, reassuring itself with semantics. And smelling like shit, of course. I don't care what your agenda is, you have no power. I'm not saying you wouldn't (attempt to) combat climate change, I'm saying you couldn't.

>> No.13657584

>>13656929

it's worth a read if you're an angry teenager whose parents won't buy him a car and god damn the system sucks and it makes you want to blow stuff up and yeah anarchist is the ultimate philosophy fuck capitalism because i can't get a car